From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?David_K=C3=A5gedal?= Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Rename "bury" back to "sink". Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 11:28:23 -0700 Message-ID: <87zm48wpbs.fsf@morpheus.local> References: <20070504224639.26133.6157.stgit@gandelf.nowhere.earth> <20070505201307.GE19253@nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 13 20:28:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HnIoT-0007ID-8s for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 13 May 2007 20:28:57 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757542AbXEMS2w convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 May 2007 14:28:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757573AbXEMS2w (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 May 2007 14:28:52 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:43744 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757542AbXEMS2v (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 May 2007 14:28:51 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HnIoA-0004u1-SA for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 13 May 2007 20:28:38 +0200 Received: from adsl-71-131-20-72.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net ([71.131.20.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 20:28:38 +0200 Received: from davidk by adsl-71-131-20-72.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 20:28:38 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-71-131-20-72.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5ASbm9kUQRvHZ7iy4XAjNOS92lU= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Yann Dirson writes: > Side note about the "stg move" name: yes it could possible to mistake= it > for "move file" (especially as we don't have "stg mv"). My current > state of mind would be to drop add/rm/cp from stgit, and move the "st= g > cp" logic to a new git-cp command. This way, stgit would just be > about handling series of patches, with git being used for the > working-copy. Any opinions on this ? =46or this reason, and others, I think "stg reorder" would be better. Especially if you implement Karl's suggestion of reordering all patches in an editor. --=20 David K=C3=A5gedal