On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:40:27 +0100, Damien Wyart said: > Hi, > > * Peter Zijlstra [2010-11-27 21:15]: > > How does this work for you? Its hideous but lets start simple. > > [...] > > Doesn't give wrong numbers like initial bug and tentative patches, but > feels a bit too slow when numbers go up and down. Correct values are > reached when waiting long enough, but it feels slow. Umm.. maybe the code still averages the 1/5/15 over that many minute's worth of ticks, which may be longer for a tickless kernel?