From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96472C4332F for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2023 11:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235225AbjKALaz (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2023 07:30:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45890 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235207AbjKALay (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2023 07:30:54 -0400 Received: from esa9.hc1455-7.c3s2.iphmx.com (esa9.hc1455-7.c3s2.iphmx.com [139.138.36.223]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AF43121; Wed, 1 Nov 2023 04:30:51 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10880"; a="126581274" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,268,1694703600"; d="scan'208";a="126581274" Received: from unknown (HELO yto-r1.gw.nic.fujitsu.com) ([218.44.52.217]) by esa9.hc1455-7.c3s2.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Nov 2023 20:30:49 +0900 Received: from yto-m1.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (yto-nat-yto-m1.gw.nic.fujitsu.com [192.168.83.64]) by yto-r1.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7ECDD9DA9; Wed, 1 Nov 2023 20:30:46 +0900 (JST) Received: from kws-ab3.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (kws-ab3.gw.nic.fujitsu.com [192.51.206.21]) by yto-m1.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C19CFA5A; Wed, 1 Nov 2023 20:30:46 +0900 (JST) Received: from edo.cn.fujitsu.com (edo.cn.fujitsu.com [10.167.33.5]) by kws-ab3.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83FB20077827; Wed, 1 Nov 2023 20:30:45 +0900 (JST) Received: from [192.168.50.5] (unknown [10.167.226.34]) by edo.cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C78C1A006F; Wed, 1 Nov 2023 19:30:44 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <88e9bc61-ac74-4503-a29a-d4f8dba841c1@fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 19:30:43 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs-linux: for-next updated to 22c2699cb068 To: Chandan Babu R Cc: Christoph Hellwig , catherine.hoang@oracle.com, cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn, dan.j.williams@intel.com, dchinner@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, osandov@fb.com, "Darrick J. Wong" References: <87fs1s3bk6.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> <20231031090242.GA25889@lst.de> <20231031164359.GA1041814@frogsfrogsfrogs> <875y2mk9fo.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> From: Shiyang Ruan In-Reply-To: <875y2mk9fo.fsf@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-9.1.0.1417-9.0.0.1002-27970.007 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TMASE-Version: IMSS-9.1.0.1417-9.0.1002-27970.007 X-TMASE-Result: 10--12.676000-10.000000 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: mafpUJSAc1CPvrMjLFD6eHchRkqzj/bEC/ExpXrHizxBqLOmHiM3w/tl NRuGlPT/GApc67FGFgwxeHwgHyVfP9MMbVgJKQCJatGCGdi/nWoxXH/dlhvLv8v8BP3RkorXVhY Zjy1spv54uAitfy71buI0KIuLJPBCh2Em++ruuH+OtWfhyZ77DithirXYhZk5Uqcf/uZ2V1ijxY yRBa/qJQYnglAWdCYb9BIhiTDfOc3YoM82yqmFMvoLR4+zsDTtD12T7q2dIUtO7oA8A9JhHuM6H GE5OQFKwFdBRkLAn2brh8DF2dbkaQ== X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org 在 2023/11/1 1:02, Chandan Babu R 写道: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 09:43:59 AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 10:02:42AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> Can you also pick up: >>> >>> "xfs: only remap the written blocks in xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent" >>> >>> ? >>> >>> Also this seems to a bit of a mix of fixes for 6.7 and big stuff that >>> is too late for the merge window. >> >> If by 'big stuff' you mean the MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE patch, then yes, I >> agree that it's too late to be changing code outside xfs. Bumping that >> to 6.8 will disappoint Shiyang, regrettably. >> > > I am sorry Shiyang, I will have to postpone your "mm, pmem, xfs: Introduce > MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE for unbind" patch for v6.8. The delay was my > mistake. Apologies once again. Never mind~ Then we'll have more time to test it, make sure the functionality is good. -- Thanks, Ruan. > > I have updated xfs-linux's for-next branch and I will be sending an > announcement shortly. >