From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw01.freescale.net (de01egw01.freescale.net [192.88.165.102]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BB42BDB5 for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 02:47:17 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <41E7E64F.2080807@anagramm.de> References: <41E7E64F.2080807@anagramm.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: <891B097E-6643-11D9-A3DB-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com> From: Kumar Gala Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:47:03 -0600 To: "Clemens Koller" Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.x to MPC8540/Microsys Board List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Clemens, I would to just use 2.6.10 as starting point and get that working. The=20= amount of changes to board code is about 100 lines to go from OCP to=20 platform_device. I should be releasing patches for this upstream today=20= and will CC the linuxppc-embedded list, so if you really want them you=20= can get them, but I dont think its worth the pain for you. - kumar On Jan 14, 2005, at 9:33 AM, Clemens Koller wrote: > Kumar Gala wrote: > > > I would suggest 2.6.10 if you want an official kernel release.=A0 Is=20= > this > > board generally available to people? > > Yes: www.microsys.de miriac Module: PM854 (and some others) > > > Be aware there are some infrastrucal changes I'm working on that=20 > moves > > the 85xx sub-arch support from using OCP to platform_device.=A0=20 > However, > > these have minor changes on the board files. > > I've read your last mails in this list... therefore I am asking. :-) > I just don't want to re-invent the wheel twice. In the pm854 specific > things there are also some OCP updates. (Well, I am still reading = lots > of code... newland for me) > I try to contact the developer Josef Wagner at Microsys who was=20 > working > on the 2.4.26-sth. > > > I would take a look at how 2.6 is structured for 85xx.=A0 I tried to=20= > do a > > better job and provide more common code for a board port to=20 > leverage.=A0 > > So for something like PCI, you should hopefully just have to setup=20= > your > > memory map and IRQ routing. > > I am comparing 2.4.26-sth with 2.6.10 now. The changes are manageable=20= > as > far as I got it. Where can I get the current work from you?! > > Greets, > > Clemens Koller > _______________________________ > R&D Imaging Devices > Anagramm GmbH > Rupert-Mayer-Str. 45/1 > 81379 Muenchen > Germany > > http://www.anagramm.de > Phone: +49-89-741518-50 > Fax: +49-89-741518-19 > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-embedded mailing list > Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded