From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 350BA1B7F4 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 14:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754661862; cv=none; b=gK4tePocuP3pWZzezcJUb1el0wfNQ0H31tg+ipYpvoOdxL65qA/Y6APjciiuU4Wqh5PSpBRT6XaV9FIQR7DBAgz1ob1lw04HA5gPoBHxEnLngwqrjSYU4dUumWWJquYko0EnnhV3sg9ehr87IwAXC9h8HvozjjMjRp2ea4t6nn0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754661862; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lH0qbFTTYUMTqXMaqajFGf+9gnpTLp5KVV1ioocLXHw=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=oitBphfUtg64NVYoNv7MxAkTOJBz2wpRNzpEncEEp3e4hAHiTuypG5e3XujJJ+VYjy/ImVLNJ15SxoeuNx2RRdI/L3IcM6gfG9IgbB13EwQs+dzNgML2mB6XS37xa+yVpRv+d0qVJf0rGucq7AxWRf5BLXapPK2CnyQtVOesyE4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4bz5Hr33LGz6L4vy; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 21:59:36 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6817A14022E; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 22:04:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500007.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.172) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 16:04:15 +0200 Received: from frapeml500007.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.172]) by frapeml500007.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.172]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.039; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 16:04:15 +0200 From: Shiju Jose To: Jonathan Cameron CC: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" , "armbru@redhat.com" , "dave@stgolabs.net" , Linuxarm Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 1/7] hw/cxl/events: Update for rev3.2 common event record format Thread-Topic: [PATCH v5 1/7] hw/cxl/events: Update for rev3.2 common event record format Thread-Index: AQHcB7IbgHJy8x5snE+W5U6ovLZH5LRYn+mAgAArEnA= Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 14:04:15 +0000 Message-ID: <891c3fc930fa45cc9a3b01ac028a4c15@huawei.com> References: <20250807154346.2209-1-shiju.jose@huawei.com> <20250807154346.2209-2-shiju.jose@huawei.com> <20250808142907.000022f4@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20250808142907.000022f4@huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 >-----Original Message----- >From: Jonathan Cameron >Sent: 08 August 2025 14:29 >To: Shiju Jose >Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org; armbru@redhat.com; >dave@stgolabs.net; Linuxarm >Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] hw/cxl/events: Update for rev3.2 common event >record format > >On Thu, 7 Aug 2025 16:43:40 +0100 > wrote: > >> From: Shiju Jose >> >> CXL spec 3.2 section 8.2.9.2.1 Table 8-55, Common Event Record format >> has updated with optional Maintenance Operation Subclass, LD ID and ID >> of the device head information. >> >> Add updates for the above optional parameters in the related CXL >> events reporting and in the QMP commands to inject CXL events. >> >> In qapi/cxl.json added fields of Common Event Record to a common >> structure CXLCommonEventBase. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron >Hi Shiju, > >Sign off chain doesn't make sense. Drop my SoB. I guess this is because i= t went >through my tree at some stage and hence was tagged by me. Given it's your >patch, you should drop that from new versions. Hi Jonathan, Thanks. I will do. > >Jonathan > > >> Signed-off-by: Shiju Jose Thanks, Shiju From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31BA7C87FD3 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 14:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ukNhx-0004Yr-3f; Fri, 08 Aug 2025 10:04:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ukNht-0004Y9-V9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2025 10:04:29 -0400 Received: from [185.176.79.56] (helo=frasgout.his.huawei.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ukNhn-0005D9-V0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2025 10:04:29 -0400 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4bz5Hr33LGz6L4vy; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 21:59:36 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6817A14022E; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 22:04:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500007.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.172) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 16:04:15 +0200 Received: from frapeml500007.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.172]) by frapeml500007.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.172]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.039; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 16:04:15 +0200 To: Jonathan Cameron CC: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org" , "armbru@redhat.com" , "dave@stgolabs.net" , Linuxarm Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 1/7] hw/cxl/events: Update for rev3.2 common event record format Thread-Topic: [PATCH v5 1/7] hw/cxl/events: Update for rev3.2 common event record format Thread-Index: AQHcB7IbgHJy8x5snE+W5U6ovLZH5LRYn+mAgAArEnA= Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 14:04:15 +0000 Message-ID: <891c3fc930fa45cc9a3b01ac028a4c15@huawei.com> References: <20250807154346.2209-1-shiju.jose@huawei.com> <20250807154346.2209-2-shiju.jose@huawei.com> <20250808142907.000022f4@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20250808142907.000022f4@huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.195.244.202] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 185.176.79.56 (deferred) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.176.79.56; envelope-from=shiju.jose@huawei.com; helo=frasgout.his.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -33 X-Spam_score: -3.4 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Shiju Jose From: Shiju Jose via Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org >-----Original Message----- >From: Jonathan Cameron >Sent: 08 August 2025 14:29 >To: Shiju Jose >Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org; armbru@redhat.com; >dave@stgolabs.net; Linuxarm >Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] hw/cxl/events: Update for rev3.2 common event >record format > >On Thu, 7 Aug 2025 16:43:40 +0100 > wrote: > >> From: Shiju Jose >> >> CXL spec 3.2 section 8.2.9.2.1 Table 8-55, Common Event Record format >> has updated with optional Maintenance Operation Subclass, LD ID and ID >> of the device head information. >> >> Add updates for the above optional parameters in the related CXL >> events reporting and in the QMP commands to inject CXL events. >> >> In qapi/cxl.json added fields of Common Event Record to a common >> structure CXLCommonEventBase. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron >Hi Shiju, > >Sign off chain doesn't make sense. Drop my SoB. I guess this is because i= t went >through my tree at some stage and hence was tagged by me. Given it's your >patch, you should drop that from new versions. Hi Jonathan, Thanks. I will do. > >Jonathan > > >> Signed-off-by: Shiju Jose Thanks, Shiju