From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, David <david@unsolicited.net>
Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25 Kernel - Problems with capabilities
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:04:20 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <898767.43890.qm@web36607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y7788hul.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
--- Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> David <david@unsolicited.net> writes:
>
> > Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >> Do you have a libcap that reflects the change from 32 capabilities
> >> to 64? You'll be looking for libcap.so.2.06 or thereabouts.
> >>
> > Adding libcap-2.08 and recompiling ntpd has fixed the issue, and I'm
> > now running normally, thanks!
>
> FWIW I ran into this problem too with systemtap. It was a quite
> nasty surprise and took some time to track down.
>
> I also don't remember seeing a thread about this on l-k. Where was this
> major binary breakage discussed?
lkml and lsm.
Casey Schaufler
casey@schaufler-ca.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-20 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-19 18:43 2.6.25 Kernel - Problems with capabilities David
[not found] ` <1208676743.4763.10.camel@marge.simson.net>
2008-04-20 14:09 ` David
2008-04-20 17:15 ` Casey Schaufler
2008-04-20 17:29 ` David
2008-04-20 19:08 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-20 22:04 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2008-04-20 22:36 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-21 0:00 ` serge
2008-04-21 0:44 ` Andrew Morgan
2008-04-21 7:20 ` David R
2008-04-21 7:01 ` David R
2008-04-21 18:34 ` serge
2008-04-21 18:48 ` David
2008-04-21 19:01 ` serge
2008-04-21 20:28 ` David
2008-04-22 2:42 ` serge
2008-04-22 5:29 ` Andrew G. Morgan
2008-04-22 5:54 ` David R
2008-04-20 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=898767.43890.qm@web36607.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=david@unsolicited.net \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.