From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Mark Moseley <moseleymark@gmail.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com,
Linux filesystem caching discussion list
<linux-cachefs@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-cachefs] 3.0.3 64-bit Crash running fscache/cachefilesd
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:26:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8997.1318411590@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOH1cHkTiitknOsjnu9n7B2Ax+pSgM-EFDFJodjDnamxt3RMCA@mail.gmail.com>
Mark Moseley <moseleymark@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> [37818.485559] kernel BUG at fs/fscache/object-list.c:64!
> >
> > Hmmm... An object is being added to the object list twice. It may
> > indicate a free before an object is finished with. Do you have slab
> > debugging turned on?
>
> It's compiled in but not currently enabled. Should I do so?
It can't be turned on or off dynamically. If CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is enabled, then
it's switched on.
> And anything I should be looking for in it?
The BUG that you encountered would suggest a piece of memory is still in use as
far as parts of fscache is concerned - but it's just been produced by the slab
allocator again. This is the sort of thing the slab debugger might catch.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-12 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-25 16:44 3.0.3 64-bit Crash running fscache/cachefilesd Mark Moseley
2011-08-26 12:52 ` [Linux-cachefs] " Дмитрий Ильин
2011-09-01 13:04 ` David Howells
2011-09-22 17:03 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-22 21:41 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-26 11:32 ` David Howells
2011-09-26 21:02 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-27 0:59 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-27 23:46 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-29 14:57 ` David Howells
2011-09-29 15:51 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-29 16:30 ` David Howells
2011-09-29 19:02 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-29 22:11 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-29 22:44 ` David Howells
2011-09-29 22:51 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-30 12:28 ` David Howells
2011-09-30 18:57 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-30 20:10 ` David Howells
2011-10-05 13:37 ` David Howells
2011-10-05 13:49 ` David Howells
2011-10-07 10:42 ` David Howells
2011-10-08 16:32 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-11 13:07 ` David Howells
2011-10-11 16:27 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-12 9:26 ` David Howells [this message]
2011-10-12 10:05 ` David Howells
2011-10-12 18:10 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-12 23:38 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-13 15:21 ` David Howells
2011-10-13 20:48 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-14 9:22 ` David Howells
2011-10-14 23:25 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-17 10:39 ` David Howells
2011-10-19 12:25 ` David Howells
2011-10-19 23:15 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-20 8:46 ` David Howells
2011-10-20 19:37 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-20 9:03 ` David Howells
2011-10-20 19:29 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-20 23:05 ` David Howells
2011-10-21 0:21 ` Mark Moseley
2011-10-21 8:16 ` David Howells
2011-10-21 18:09 ` Mark Moseley
2011-12-13 1:56 ` Mark Moseley
2011-09-29 22:44 ` Mark Moseley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8997.1318411590@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=moseleymark@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.