From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reintegrate legacy UMS. Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:41:08 +0100 Message-ID: <89k77n$otobjj@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com> References: <1282678274-18099-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> <89k77n$opjlk4@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com> <4C796B9A.3070302@dolphinling.net> <8u3s94$gc9of6@orsmga002.jf.intel.com> <4C7AF16E.7030007@dolphinling.net> <4C893767.8060205@dolphinling.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6989EFB2 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:41:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C893767.8060205@dolphinling.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Andrew Guertin , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:37:11 -0400, Andrew Guertin wrote: > Here's a nicer version of that backtrace. (Does X not deal well with split > debugging files?) valgrind confirms that we continue to use the old buffer after the resize, and although I've poked in a few locations I haven't found where it has been secreted away. I have a plan though... -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre