Re: [PATCH V3 7/8] soundwire: amd: handle SoundWire wake enable interrupt

[Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>]

On 2/20/23 05:04, Vijendar Mukunda wrote:
> Add wake enable interrupt support for both the SoundWire manager
> instances.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mastan Katragadda <Mastan.Katragadda@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c b/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> index 3322adeca0d8..a7182aa78652 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> @@ -932,6 +932,13 @@ static void amd_sdw_update_slave_status(u32 status_change_0to7, u32 status_chang
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void amd_sdw_process_wake_event(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager)
> +{
> +	pm_request_resume(amd_manager->dev);

is this needed?

In the Intel case, the wakes do not necessarily come as in-band wakes,
but they can also be notified by the PCI subsystem, so we do have to use
pm_request_resume.

In the AMD case, what happens if you don't do this? Doesn't the
interrupt trigger a pm_runtime_resume already?

> +	acp_reg_writel(0x00, amd_manager->acp_mmio + ACP_SW_WAKE_EN(amd_manager->instance));
> +	acp_reg_writel(0x00, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_STATE_CHANGE_STATUS_8TO11);
> +}
\