From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bin Ren Subject: Re: [PATCH] Network Checksum Removal Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 19:08:10 +0100 Message-ID: <8ae7802505052311086b44a142@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050520233015.GA26305@us.ibm.com> <8ae78025050523085662a94019@mail.gmail.com> <8ae7802505052309067d88f174@mail.gmail.com> <200505231116.16964.jdmason@us.ibm.com> <8ae7802505052309362c2fb00e@mail.gmail.com> <32fa5a4ad70f86ee5637d30ffc890017@cl.cam.ac.uk> Reply-To: bin.ren@cl.cam.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <32fa5a4ad70f86ee5637d30ffc890017@cl.cam.ac.uk> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: Andrew Theurer , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Jon Mason List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org It's via the new vif0.0/veth0. I did tcpdump on vif1.0 in dom0 and saw packets sent by dom0, but got dropped by the netfront on dom1. Cheers, Bin On 5/23/05, Keir Fraser wrote: >=20 > On 23 May 2005, at 17:36, Bin Ren wrote: >=20 > > Keir has removed 'SET_ETHTOOL_OPS(dev, &network_ethtool_ops);' from > > your patch. The operations are not supported. >=20 > Ah, I thought that was just testing infrastructure. I'll take a patch > to add the ethtool ops back in. >=20 > Bin -- does your domain0 traffic get delivered via the bridge device or > via the new vif0.0/veth0 that I added? If the former you might want to > try updating your /etc/xen/scripts/network script. Although delivery > via the bridge ought to work... >=20 > -- Keir >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >