Re: Git in Outreachy?

[Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com>]

On 21-09-2020 09:52, Christian Couder wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 6:31 PM Kaartic Sivaraam
> <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 07-09-2020 00:26, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote:>
>>>
>>> I'm guessing only the status of submodule has changed as it's being
>>> worked on now.
>>
>> After giving it a second thought, I believe I should take back my word
>> about the git-submodule status changing. There still seems to be some
>> work left for it.
> 
> Yeah, there is some work left, but Shourya said he was interested in
> continuing to work on it.
> 

Yeah, he's most welcome to resume his work :)

>> To be clear,
>>
>> - there's 'add', whose conversion is currently stalled [1]
> 
> Yeah, but it hasn't been stalled for a long time, and sometimes it
> takes time after the GSoC or Outreachy period for former GSoC students
> or Outreachy interns to resume their work.
>

Ok. Got it.

>> - there's 'update', which still has a decent amount of code [2]
>>   in the shell script.
>> - we still have to complete the conversion completely converting
>>   moving the rest of the bits from `git-submodule.sh` to C which is
>>   mostly just the option parsing. This might be more trickier than
>>   it sounds as we would've to ensure the we don't accidentally
>>   change behaviour of the options when moving the option parsing to C.
>>
>>   There's also an e-mail from Junio which is relevant [3]
>>
>> I'm not sure if this would be enough for a complete project on it's own.
>> I'm also not sure whether 'add' would get converted in the meantime. In
>> any case, I believe we could add a few other small refactoring projects
>> to make up for the rest of the period. For instance,
>>
>> - Replace more instances of `the_index` and `the_repository`
>>   (https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/issues/379)
>>
>> - Turn the `fetch_if_missing` global into a field of `struct repository`
>>   (https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/issues/251)
>>
>> - Possibly others from #leftoverbits
>>
>> Thoughts?
> 
> Yeah, without 'add' we would have enough related issues for another
> project. I would prefer though that we wait for at least 3 months
> without any progress before suggesting them as a project. That's what
> we usually do and I think it's the right thing to do.
> 

Ok. That makes sense. I also missed the fact that Shourya had also
expressed interested in converting the 'update' part of submodule in his
final GSoC report [A]. So, I agree that it's too early to propose the
rest of the submodule work for Outreachy.

Thanks.


References
===
[A]: https://shouryashukla.blogspot.com/2020/08/the-final-report.html

--
Sivaraam