From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5710253429239795718=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug/Oversight in gatchat/gatresult.c with negative numbers
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 09:44:11 -0500
Message-ID: <8b36e889-4803-870f-884e-da4a41ee70a5@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1b573a42-717d-9639-fe19-833667804137@dynamicdevices.co.uk>
List-Id: <ofono.ofono.org>
To: ofono@ofono.org

--===============5710253429239795718==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Alex,

> =

> OK - they say it's fine and you say it's not. I don't have the time to be=
 the =

> middle-man here.
> =


I'm fairly certain your vendor's firmware is not following the relevant =

standards, but it sounds like they don't want to fix it.  What can I do? :)

> Although I'd like to, clearly I won't be able to contribute this Quectel =
support =

> upstream.
> =


Why does it even matter?  I told you very early on that it would be accepta=
ble =

to add a new g_at_result_* method that handles negative integers.

Regards,
-Denis
--===============5710253429239795718==--