From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 15:39:34 -0600
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v3] Wrapper for Syzkaller reproducers
In-Reply-To: <20200609195851.GA29515@x230>
References: <20200609113421.10936-1-rpalethorpe@suse.com>
 <20200609165921.GA28805@dell5510>
 <fa3b9d86-84f7-be61-f06f-c32f3ab60d3a@linuxfoundation.org>
 <CACT4Y+bYdmD7vdNUayT86oiW8yVLUBdFLOZRJ1nTi9AE99KzSg@mail.gmail.com>
 <ce8bd6c0-0abb-e09e-b21f-5e769ffd3ab3@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20200609195851.GA29515@x230>
Message-ID: <8b3cbf25-83ad-42da-f3ec-e2bafdfff97c@linuxfoundation.org>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it

On 6/9/20 1:58 PM, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Shuah,
> 
> ...
>>> I don't have any particular comments.
>>> I assume Richard tested it and it works. if so, it's fine with me :)
>>> I don't have any concrete plans to use this at the moment. We have a
>>> corpus of reproducers in syzkaller format and we can run these. This
>>> should be more useful for kernel continuous integration systems and
>>> distro testing.
> 
>> Right. That is what I was thinking that this is more relevant for kernel
>> developers, CI and distros.
> 
>> Richard, Please send the patch for linux-arts to me once Petr gives it a
>> try and I will apply it.
> NOTE: this patch is for LTP. But maybe I miss something (some other patch for
> linux-arts I overlooked).
> 

Possibly I misread the

V3:
+ Updated linux-arts commit (thanks Dmitry and Shuah for updating those!)
+ Fixed AC macro

If this patch doesn't intend to update syzkaller-repo, there is
nothing to do for linux-arts. I thought that this patch is for
Dmitry's syzkaller repo I update from and looking get this into
linux-arts directly.

Since this is LTP patch, ignore my comments. Sorry for the noise.

thanks,
-- Shuah