Re: [PATCH 2/7] iio: inkern: Add API for reading/writing events

[Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>]

On 7/15/25 04:18, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 09:20:18PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> Add an in-kernel API for reading/writing event properties. Like the
>> raw-to-processed conversion, with processed-to-raw we only convert the
>> integer part, introducing some round-off error.
>> 
>> A common case is for other drivers to re-expose IIO events as sysfs
>> properties with a different API. To help out with this, iio_event_mode
>> returns the appropriate mode. It can also be used to test for existence
>> if the consumer doesn't care about read/write capability.
> 
> ...
> 
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_event_mode);
> 
> Can we move this to namespace? Otherwise it will be never ending story...
> Ditto for other new APIs.

Never ending story of what?

> ...
> 
>> +			if (scale64 <= INT_MAX && scale64 >= INT_MIN)
>> +				raw64 = processed / (int)scale64;
> 
> Do you need the casting? (I mean if the compiler is dumb enough to not see this)

AIUI 64-bit division is not available on 32-bit platforms. The cast
ensures we get 32-bit division.

> ...
> 
>> +		case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO:
>> +			scale64 = scale_val * scale * 1000000LL + scale_val2;
>> +			raw64 = div64_s64_rem(processed, scale64, &r);
>> +			raw64 = raw64 * 1000000 +
>> +				div64_s64(r * 1000000, scale64);
> 
> Logically this should be 1000000L, but can we somehow use the constants?
> Like
> 
> 			scale64 = (s64)MICRO * scale_val * scale + scale_val2;
> 			raw64 = div64_s64_rem(processed, scale64, &r);
> 			raw64 = raw64 * (s32)MICRO +
> 				div64_s64(r * (s64)MICRO, scale64);
> 

This follows iio_convert_raw_to_processed_unlocked but ok...

>> +			break;
> 
> Ditto for other cases?
> 
> ...
> 
>> +	*raw = clamp(raw64, (s64)INT_MIN, (s64)INT_MAX);
> 
> You already have similar approach here...

Well, I can spell it 0x7fffffffLL if you'd like...

>> +	ret = iio_convert_processed_to_raw_unlocked(chan, processed, &raw,
>> +						    scale);
>> +	if (ret < 0)
> 
> Why ' < 0' ?

Originally I returned IIO_VAL_INT but later decided against it.

--Sean