From: John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] block: cap atomic write size by PI buffer size constraints
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 09:09:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c16f727-c840-4a8f-94a7-fbe09bc3735a@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907074111.721054-3-hch@lst.de>
On 9/7/26 08:40, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> As Sashiko points out,
Do you have a reference for that? I'm just curious, as we don't support
atomics for integrity writes. Well, for SCSI we don't... we impose this
restriction via sd_config_atomic(), I need to check for the same in NVMe...
> limiting the I/O size by the size of the available
> PI buffer can cause inconsistencies for atomic writes. This also limit
> atomic_write_max_sectors in blk_validate_integrity_limits.
>
> Fixes: ec7f31b2a2d3 ("block: make bio auto-integrity deadlock safe")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> block/blk-settings.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
> index 8274631290db..e469baa1f08b 100644
> --- a/block/blk-settings.c
> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,12 @@ static int blk_validate_integrity_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
> lim->max_sectors = min(lim->max_sectors,
> max_integrity_io_size(lim) >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
>
> + if (lim->features & BLK_FEAT_ATOMIC_WRITES) {
> + lim->atomic_write_max_sectors =
> + min(lim->atomic_write_max_sectors,
> + max_integrity_io_size(lim) >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 7:40 misc block PI / bounce buffering fixes Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-07 7:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: avoid integer overflows in max_integrity_io_size Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-07 7:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: cap atomic write size by PI buffer size constraints Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-07 8:09 ` John Garry [this message]
2026-09-07 8:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-07 9:19 ` John Garry
2026-09-09 2:44 ` Martin K. Petersen
2026-09-09 7:52 ` John Garry
2026-09-09 9:16 ` John Garry
2026-09-10 5:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-10 8:45 ` John Garry
2026-09-10 12:52 ` John Garry
2026-09-10 14:43 ` John Garry
2026-09-07 7:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: improve aligning down bios in bio_iov_iter_bounce_write Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-09 2:47 ` misc block PI / bounce buffering fixes Martin K. Petersen (Oracle)
2026-09-11 16:41 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8c16f727-c840-4a8f-94a7-fbe09bc3735a@linux.dev \
--to=john.garry@linux.dev \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.