From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Anderson Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 22:18:18 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v2 01/11] clk: Always use the supplied struct clk In-Reply-To: References: <3411d84b-5a56-ae4e-1deb-085ef1a4971d@gmail.com> <752D002CFF5D0F4FA35C0100F1D73F3FA46C88BE@ATCPCS16.andestech.com> <2cea6898-1ce5-f7fe-694e-48d782d306d9@gmail.com> Message-ID: <8c660de0-b462-2a71-2710-dd5dc7cb4852@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > I am not sure the modifications of clk are ok for other people. > It will be better to send pure riscv relative patch-sets. Hm, well at the moment removing the dependency on these two patches would probably require a substantial rewrite of patch 11, which would primarily consist of duplicating functionality currently found in the clk_composite driver. I actually think the way clk_composite works at the moment is very confusing, since the imx code which uses it uses some custom functions to smooth out clk_composite's behaviour. These two patches are probably the ones I would like to see merged most of all, since it would make implementing complex clock drivers like on this board much easier. I originally submitted these patches around a month ago [1, 2], so I was hoping that I'd have recieved feedback one way or the other by now. [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1215327/ [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1215328/