From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] PCI/DPC: Use FIELD_GET()
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 18:14:13 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ca2ad3-da7d-c82c-cbdf-b5363760444e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524d1789-6b57-aae-17b7-bf7ae49719dc@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3901 bytes --]
On Mon, 16 Oct 2023, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2023, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 02:01:13PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 10 Oct 2023, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > > From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Use FIELD_GET() to remove dependences on the field position, i.e., the
> > > > > shift value. No functional change intended.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 9 +++++----
> > > > > drivers/pci/quirks.c | 2 +-
> > > > > include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 1 +
> > > > > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > > > > index 3ceed8e3de41..6e551f34ec63 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c
> > > > > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> > > > >
> > > > > #define dev_fmt(fmt) "DPC: " fmt
> > > > >
> > > > > +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/aer.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/delay.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > > > @@ -202,7 +203,7 @@ static void dpc_process_rp_pio_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > > >
> > > > > /* Get First Error Pointer */
> > > > > pci_read_config_word(pdev, cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS, &dpc_status);
> > > > > - first_error = (dpc_status & 0x1f00) >> 8;
> > > > > + first_error = FIELD_GET(PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_FIRST_ERR, dpc_status);
> > > > >
> > > > > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rp_pio_error_string); i++) {
> > > > > if ((status & ~mask) & (1 << i))
> > > > > @@ -270,8 +271,8 @@ void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > > > pci_info(pdev, "containment event, status:%#06x source:%#06x\n",
> > > > > status, source);
> > > > >
> > > > > - reason = (status & PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER_RSN) >> 1;
> > > > > - ext_reason = (status & PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER_RSN_EXT) >> 5;
> > > > > + reason = FIELD_GET(PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER_RSN, status);
> > > > > + ext_reason = FIELD_GET(PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER_RSN_EXT, status);
> > > > > pci_warn(pdev, "%s detected\n",
> > > > > (reason == 0) ? "unmasked uncorrectable error" :
> > > > > (reason == 1) ? "ERR_NONFATAL" :
> > > >
> > > > BTW, it seems we're doing overlapping work here with many of these
> > > > patches. It takes some time to think these through one by one, I don't
> > > > just autorun through them with coccinelle so I've not posted my changes
> > > > yet.
> > > >
> > > > I went to a different direction here and named all the reasons too with
> > > > defines and used & to get the reason in order to be able to compare with
> > > > the named reasons.
> > > >
> > > > You also missed convering one 0xfff4 to use define (although I suspect it
> > > > never was your goal to go beyond FIELD_GET() here).
> > >
> > > Pure FIELD_GET() and FIELD_PREP() was my goal.
> > >
> > > If you have patches you prefer, I'll drop mine. I did these about a
> > > year ago and it seemed like the time to do something with them since
> > > you did the PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_NLW ones and to try to prevent overlapping
> > > work. Since we've started, I'd like to get as much of it done this
> > > cycle as possible.
> >
> > Okay, I suggest you keep your FIELD_GET/PREP() patch since mine is getting
> > more and more complicated. I can build a nice set of small changes about
> > what remains to do in DPC on top of your patch.
>
> Err, actually, there's still the naming of the define, should _FEP be used
> for First Error Pointer for consistency? You should make that small change
> into your patch if you think _FEP is better because of consistency.
There's also #include order so it seems you should just drop the patch, I
can handle this along my series.
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-16 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-10 20:44 [PATCH 00/10] PCI: Use FIELD_GET() and FIELD_PREP() Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-10 20:44 ` [PATCH 01/10] PCI: Use FIELD_GET() Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-11 10:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-11 11:24 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-10 20:44 ` [PATCH 02/10] PCI: Use FIELD_GET() in Sapphire RX 5600 XT Pulse quirk Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-11 10:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-11 11:31 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-10 20:44 ` [PATCH 03/10] PCI/ASPM: Use FIELD_GET() Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-10 21:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-10 20:44 ` [PATCH 04/10] PCI/ATS: Show PASID Capability register width in bitmasks Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-11 11:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-11 11:31 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-10 20:44 ` [PATCH 05/10] PCI/ATS: Use FIELD_GET() Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-11 11:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-11 11:20 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-10 20:44 ` [PATCH 06/10] PCI/DPC: " Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-11 11:01 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-13 11:23 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-13 20:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-16 12:55 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-16 15:10 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-16 15:14 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2023-10-11 11:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-11 11:13 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-10 20:44 ` [PATCH 07/10] PCI/PME: " Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-11 11:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-11 11:38 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-10 20:44 ` [PATCH 08/10] PCI/PTM: " Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-11 11:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-11 11:15 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-10 20:44 ` [PATCH 09/10] PCI/VC: " Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-11 11:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-11 11:39 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-10 20:44 ` [PATCH 10/10] PCI/portdrv: " Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-11 11:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-10-11 11:40 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-10-11 14:50 ` [PATCH 00/10] PCI: Use FIELD_GET() and FIELD_PREP() Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2023-10-18 21:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ca2ad3-da7d-c82c-cbdf-b5363760444e@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.