All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Anirban, Sk" <sk.anirban@intel.com>
To: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <kamil.konieczny@intel.com>, Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
	<I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for tests/intel/xe_survivability: Add xe_survivability test (rev12)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 15:35:21 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d93b054-418c-4503-b361-059f9d1324c1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <176231443150.18967.10993927745487233097@10055242dc62>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2667 bytes --]

Hi,
These reported failures are not related to my changes.
Please do re-report.

Thanks,
Anirban

On 05-11-2025 09:17, Patchwork wrote:
> Project List - Patchwork *Patch Details*
> *Series:* 	tests/intel/xe_survivability: Add xe_survivability test 
> (rev12)
> *URL:* 	https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/154342/
> *State:* 	failure
> *Details:* 
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13987/index.html
>
>
>   CI Bug Log - changes from XEIGT_8607_FULL -> XEIGTPW_13987_FULL
>
>
>     Summary
>
> *FAILURE*
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with XEIGTPW_13987_FULL absolutely need 
> to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in XEIGTPW_13987_FULL, please notify your bug team 
> (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives 
> in CI.
>
>
>     Participating hosts (4 -> 3)
>
> Missing (1): shard-adlp
>
>
>     Possible new issues
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
> XEIGTPW_13987_FULL:
>
>
>       IGT changes
>
>
>         Possible regressions
>
>  *
>
>     igt@kms_sharpness_filter@invalid-filter-with-scaler:
>
>       o shard-bmg: NOTRUN -> SKIP
>         <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13987/shard-bmg-4/igt@kms_sharpness_filter@invalid-filter-with-scaler.html>
>  *
>
>     igt@kms_vrr@seamless-rr-switch-virtual@pipe-a-edp-1:
>
>       o shard-lnl: PASS
>         <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGT_8607/shard-lnl-2/igt@kms_vrr@seamless-rr-switch-virtual@pipe-a-edp-1.html>
>         -> FAIL
>         <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13987/shard-lnl-8/igt@kms_vrr@seamless-rr-switch-virtual@pipe-a-edp-1.html>
>         +1 other test fail
>  *
>
>     igt@xe_survivability@i2c-functionality (NEW):
>
>       o shard-dg2-set2: NOTRUN -> SKIP
>         <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13987/shard-dg2-466/igt@xe_survivability@i2c-functionality.html>
>         +1 other test skip
>       o shard-lnl: NOTRUN -> SKIP
>         <https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_13987/shard-lnl-8/igt@xe_survivability@i2c-functionality.html>
>         +1 other test skip
>
>
>     New tests
>
> New tests have been introduced between XEIGT_8607_FULL and 
> XEIGTPW_13987_FULL:
>
>
>       New IGT tests (2)
>
>  *
>
>     igt@xe_survivability@i2c-functionality:
>
>       o Statuses : 1 pass(s) 2 skip(s)
>       o Exec time: [0.0, 0.02] s
>  *
>
>     igt@xe_survivability@runtime-survivability:
>
>       o Statuses : 1 pass(s) 2 skip(s)
>       o Exec time: [0.0, 2.32] s
>
>
>     Known issues
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4561 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-06 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-04  9:52 [i-g-t, v10, 0/2] tests/intel/xe_survivability: Add xe_survivability test Sk Anirban
2025-11-04  9:52 ` [i-g-t, v10, 1/2] tests/intel/xe_survivability: Add new xe_survivability test for i2c adapter Sk Anirban
2025-11-04  9:52 ` [i-g-t, v10, 2/2] tests/intel/xe_survivability: Add new test runtime survivability Sk Anirban
2025-11-04 22:32 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure for tests/intel/xe_survivability: Add xe_survivability test (rev12) Patchwork
2025-11-05 11:46   ` Anirban, Sk
2025-11-06  5:11   ` Anirban, Sk
2025-11-05  3:41 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-05  3:47 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-11-06 10:05   ` Anirban, Sk [this message]
2025-11-07  9:18     ` Ravali, JupallyX
2025-11-07  9:09 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-11-08  0:08 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8d93b054-418c-4503-b361-059f9d1324c1@intel.com \
    --to=sk.anirban@intel.com \
    --cc=I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kamil.konieczny@intel.com \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.