From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11933C433E9 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 14:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B3222D58 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 14:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2405573AbhAZOL0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:11:26 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:35510 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2392421AbhAZOLM (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:11:12 -0500 IronPort-SDR: pPIO7JudxhUyeb2IAXObMekBPWv8ay/Jan2AXTMFhlVFKTDfhXfF3ay3Zxcq7iJ9DgSGNXFnF5 zrw3wzWTmmOw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9875"; a="198692847" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,375,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="198692847" Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Jan 2021 06:09:38 -0800 IronPort-SDR: HzMdTF1Dh7cc3nioBiPD58pQ3jgbuW9zqWtqUm8UsDZ692z5H+NtigC52Pn5ZrkA4yzTd02Cw/ dAPb4EkEk2rg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,375,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="350675395" Received: from mattu-haswell.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.72.170]) ([10.237.72.170]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2021 06:09:37 -0800 Subject: Re: USB2 / USB3 compatibility problems: xhci_hcd 0000:00:06.0: WARN Wrong bounce buffer write length: 0 != 512 To: Andreas Hartmann , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org References: <3b4e35d2-9508-e0aa-eaf8-32e524ad81c4@01019freenet.de> <756e7b88-1142-4758-b8f7-a8eaf510b422@01019freenet.de> <7e953b15-925a-1512-4d15-c07fc03f9059@01019freenet.de> From: Mathias Nyman Autocrypt: addr=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFMB0ccBEADd+nZnZrFDsIjQtclVz6OsqFOQ6k0nQdveiDNeBuwyFYykkBpaGekoHZ6f lH4ogPZzQ+pzoJEMlRGXc881BIggKMCMH86fYJGfZKWdfpg9O6mqSxyEuvBHKe9eZCBKPvoC L2iwygtO8TcXXSCynvXSeZrOwqAlwnxWNRm4J2ikDck5S5R+Qie0ZLJIfaId1hELofWfuhy+ tOK0plFR0HgVVp8O7zWYT2ewNcgAzQrRbzidA3LNRfkL7jrzyAxDapuejuK8TMrFQT/wW53e uegnXcRJaibJD84RUJt+mJrn5BvZ0MYfyDSc1yHVO+aZcpNr+71yZBQVgVEI/AuEQ0+p9wpt O9Wt4zO2KT/R5lq2lSz1MYMJrtfFRKkqC6PsDSB4lGSgl91XbibK5poxrIouVO2g9Jabg04T MIPpVUlPme3mkYHLZUsboemRQp5/pxV4HTFR0xNBCmsidBICHOYAepCzNmfLhfo1EW2Uf+t4 L8IowAaoURKdgcR2ydUXjhACVEA/Ldtp3ftF4hTQ46Qhba/p4MUFtDAQ5yeA5vQVuspiwsqB BoL/298+V119JzM998d70Z1clqTc8fiGMXyVnFv92QKShDKyXpiisQn2rrJVWeXEIVoldh6+ J8M3vTwzetnvIKpoQdSFJ2qxOdQ8iYRtz36WYl7hhT3/hwkHuQARAQABtCdNYXRoaWFzIE55 bWFuIDxtYXRoaWFzLm55bWFuQGdtYWlsLmNvbT6JAjsEEwECACUCGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkK CwQWAgMBAh4BAheABQJTAeo1AhkBAAoJEFiDn/uYk8VJOdIP/jhA+RpIZ7rdUHFIYkHEKzHw tkwrJczGA5TyLgQaI8YTCTPSvdNHU9Rj19mkjhUO/9MKvwfoT2RFYqhkrtk0K92STDaBNXTL JIi4IHBqjXOyJ/dPADU0xiRVtCHWkBgjEgR7Wihr7McSdVpgupsaXhbZjXXgtR/N7PE0Wltz hAL2GAnMuIeJyXhIdIMLb+uyoydPCzKdH6znfu6Ox76XfGWBCqLBbvqPXvk4oH03jcdt+8UG 2nfSeti/To9ANRZIlSKGjddCGMa3xzjtTx9ryf1Xr0MnY5PeyNLexpgHp93sc1BKxKKtYaT0 lR6p0QEKeaZ70623oB7Sa2Ts4IytqUVxkQKRkJVWeQiPJ/dZYTK5uo15GaVwufuF8VTwnMkC 4l5X+NUYNAH1U1bpRtlT40aoLEUhWKAyVdowxW4yGCP3nL5E69tZQQgsag+OnxBa6f88j63u wxmOJGNXcwCerkCb+wUPwJzChSifFYmuV5l89LKHgSbv0WHSN9OLkuhJO+I9fsCNvro1Y7dT U/yq4aSVzjaqPT3yrnQkzVDxrYT54FLWO1ssFKAOlcfeWzqrT9QNcHIzHMQYf5c03Kyq3yMI Xi91hkw2uc/GuA2CZ8dUD3BZhUT1dm0igE9NViE1M7F5lHQONEr7MOCg1hcrkngY62V6vh0f RcDeV0ISwlZWuQINBFMB0ccBEACXKmWvojkaG+kh/yipMmqZTrCozsLeGitxJzo5hq9ev31N 2XpPGx4AGhpccbco63SygpVN2bOd0W62fJJoxGohtf/g0uVtRSuK43OTstoBPqyY/35+VnAV oA5cnfvtdx5kQPIL6LRcxmYKgN4/3+A7ejIxbOrjWFmbWCC+SgX6mzHHBrV0OMki8R+NnrNa NkUmMmosi7jBSKdoi9VqDqgQTJF/GftvmaZHqgmVJDWNrCv7UiorhesfIWPt1O/AIk9luxlE dHwkx5zkWa9CGYvV6LfP9BznendEoO3qYZ9IcUlW727Le80Q1oh69QnHoI8pODDBBTJvEq1h bOWcPm/DsNmDD8Rwr/msRmRyIoxjasFi5WkM/K/pzujICKeUcNGNsDsEDJC5TCmRO/TlvCvm 0X+vdfEJRZV6Z+QFBflK1asUz9QHFre5csG8MyVZkwTR9yUiKi3KiqQdaEu+LuDD2CGF5t68 xEl66Y6mwfyiISkkm3ETA4E8rVZP1rZQBBm83c5kJEDvs0A4zrhKIPTcI1smK+TWbyVyrZ/a mGYDrZzpF2N8DfuNSqOQkLHIOL3vuOyx3HPzS05lY3p+IIVmnPOEdZhMsNDIGmVorFyRWa4K uYjBP/W3E5p9e6TvDSDzqhLoY1RHfAIadM3I8kEx5wqco67VIgbIHHB9DbRcxQARAQABiQIf BBgBAgAJBQJTAdHHAhsMAAoJEFiDn/uYk8VJb7AQAK56tgX8V1Wa6RmZDmZ8dmBC7W8nsMRz PcKWiDSMIvTJT5bygMy1lf7gbHXm7fqezRtSfXAXr/OJqSA8LB2LWfThLyuuCvrdNsQNrI+3 D+hjHJjhW/4185y3EdmwwHcelixPg0X9EF+lHCltV/w29Pv3PiGDkoKxJrnOpnU6jrwiBebz eAYBfpSEvrCm4CR4hf+T6MdCs64UzZnNt0nxL8mLCCAGmq1iks9M4bZk+LG36QjCKGh8PDXz 9OsnJmCggptClgjTa7pO6040OW76pcVrP2rZrkjo/Ld/gvSc7yMO/m9sIYxLIsR2NDxMNpmE q/H7WO+2bRG0vMmsndxpEYS4WnuhKutoTA/goBEhtHu1fg5KC+WYXp9wZyTfeNPrL0L8F3N1 BCEYefp2JSZ/a355X6r2ROGSRgIIeYjAiSMgGAZMPEVsdvKsYw6BH17hDRzltNyIj5S0dIhb Gjynb3sXforM/GVbr4mnuxTdLXQYlj2EJ4O4f0tkLlADT7podzKSlSuZsLi2D+ohKxtP3U/r 42i8PBnX2oAV0UIkYk7Oel/3hr0+BP666SnTls9RJuoXc7R5XQVsomqXID6GmjwFQR5Wh/RE IJtkiDAsk37cfZ9d1kZ2gCQryTV9lmflSOB6AFZkOLuEVSC5qW8M/s6IGDfYXN12YJaZPptJ fiD/ Message-ID: <8de6ecb9-4a39-5742-a358-d6965feffc79@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:11:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org On 26.1.2021 9.26, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > > On 25.01.21 at 21:06 Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> Hello Mathias, >> >> On 25.01.21 at 19:28 Mathias Nyman wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> On 25.1.2021 12.18, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello! >>>> >>>> Meanwhile I found the culprit: >>>> >>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg141467.html >>>> and >>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg141468.html >>>> >>>> Especially the last change breaks things here completely. After removing them >>>> by the attached patch, problems are gone and device works again as expected >>>> (I tested with the original 24 kB bulk size which was horribly broken w/o the >>>> attached patch). This means: the additional repair steps are not just breaking >>>> things but are even unnecessary (it's working perfectly without those changes) >>>> here. >>> >>> Unfortunately this isn't enough to remove the alignment code for those >>> controllers. This is just once specific usecase. We need to figure out what >>> really goes wrong. >>> >>> Looks like 0 bytes is copied from sg list to bounce buffer when we want 512 >>> bytes copied. Just noticed the alignment code assumes sg lists are used without >>> checking it first. >>> >>> Could you add the below code and test again, it should print more debugging info. >> >> See the attached file. That's the result of two times coping 1.3 GB via scp. >> >> As the transfer mostly breaks after the wrong alignments and because >> there isn't any further alignment needed at all, I didn't do more tests. >> Hope this helps. Most importantly it should be investigated, why there >> isn't any additional alignment needed at all. > > I'm not sure if it's important for you to know: The driver doesn't use struct scatterlist or num_mapped_sgs at all (if it's meant to be used by the sender at all). > > But it sets URB_NO_TRANSFER_DMA_MAP (for data transfer among others). > > Mlme packets are sent w/o bulk and w/o setting URB_NO_TRANSFER_DMA_MAP. All other packets are sent with URB_NO_TRANSFER_DMA_MAP turned on. > Ok, thanks, I see what's going on here. Short recap of xhci alignment requirements. 1. Data pointed to by a transfer request block (TRB) may not span 64k boundary 2. If a transfer contains several TRBs, and spans over two TRB ringbuffer segments, then the sum of the TRB data in the first segment must be a multiple of max packets in size. Code assumes that if transfer is split into several blocks,(TRBs) and a block in the middle of a transfer is smaller than max packet size, then it must be sg list. But this is not necessarily the case if data was already DMA mapped beforehand. Data might start just before a 64k boundary, causing first TRB to be less than packet size. I'll start implementing a fix for this. -Mathias