From: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Aithal, Srikanth" <sraithal@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, yury.norov@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
brgerst@gmail.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
nik.borisov@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] x86/cpufeatures: Generate a feature mask header based on build config
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 02:18:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e4e1723-321a-4e8e-bbac-e2e5d8b08bfc@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250303132505.GEZ8WtsXqFpuMOpDjT@fat_crate.local>
On 3/3/2025 5:25 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 04:05:54AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> "make headers" on an unconfigured tree should presumably only produce the uapi headers, not kernel-internal ones, one could surmise?
>
> Well, that's kinda a question for you guys:
>
> cfc7686900a87 (H. Peter Anvin (Intel) 2025-02-28 00:23:36 -0800 281)archheaders: $(out)/$(featuremasks_hdr)
> 1f57d5d85ba7f (Ingo Molnar 2015-06-03 18:36:41 +0200 282) $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=arch/x86/entry/syscalls all
>
> and the headers target has
>
> headers: $(version_h) scripts_unifdef uapi-asm-generic archheaders archscripts
>
> as its prereq.
>
> Judging by
>
> 59b2bd05f5f4 ("kbuild: add 'headers' target to build up uapi headers in usr/include")
It seems that 'archprepare' works, however I'm not sure if it's the best
choice. Any suggestion?
diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile
index 60583987d320..2db535958b8d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/Makefile
@@ -276,9 +276,9 @@ $(out)/$(featuremasks_hdr): $(featuremasks_awk)
$(cpufeatures_hdr) $(KCONFIG_CON
$(shell mkdir -p $(out))
$(call if_changed,gen_featuremasks)
-targets += $(out)/$(featuremasks_hdr)
+archprepare: $(out)/$(featuremasks_hdr)
-archheaders: $(out)/$(featuremasks_hdr)
+archheaders:
$(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=arch/x86/entry/syscalls all
###
>
> it sure looks like "make headers" should be for uapi headers only.
>
> Oh, and it should be documented in "make help" output btw.
Want me to add it btw?
Thanks!
Xin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-04 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-28 8:23 [PATCH v6 0/5] x86/cpufeatures: Automatically generate required and disabled feature masks Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-28 8:23 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] x86/cpufeatures: Rename X86_CMPXCHG64 to X86_CX8 Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-28 16:53 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2025-02-28 8:23 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] x86/cpufeatures: Add {required,disabled} feature configs Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-28 16:53 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2025-03-10 8:18 ` [tip: x86/cpu] x86/cpufeatures: Add {REQUIRED,DISABLED} " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2025-03-10 14:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-10 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-10 18:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-19 11:04 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2025-02-28 8:23 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] x86/cpufeatures: Generate a feature mask header based on build config Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-28 16:53 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2025-03-03 11:38 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] " Aithal, Srikanth
2025-03-03 12:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-03 13:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 22:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-04 10:18 ` Xin Li [this message]
2025-03-04 10:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-05 7:30 ` Xin Li
2025-03-05 22:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-22 19:58 ` Xin Li
2025-02-28 8:23 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] x86/cpufeatures: Remove {disabled,required}-features.h Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-28 16:53 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-28 8:23 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/cpufeatures: Use AWK to generate {REQUIRED|DISABLED}_MASK_BIT_SET Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-28 16:53 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-10 8:18 ` [tip: x86/cpu] x86/cpufeatures: Use AWK to generate {REQUIRED|DISABLED}_MASK_BIT_SET in <asm/cpufeaturemasks.h> tip-bot2 for Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-28 9:26 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] x86/cpufeatures: Automatically generate required and disabled feature masks Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8e4e1723-321a-4e8e-bbac-e2e5d8b08bfc@zytor.com \
--to=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sraithal@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.