From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"linux-coco@lists.linux.dev" <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>,
"kas@kernel.org" <kas@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"nik.borisov@suse.com" <nik.borisov@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] KVM: TDX: Enable VM-DoS Prevention Features for TDX
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 23:08:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f715ebf5cb0ef70803ca8c6ad462d9de7dfa8be.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aoY2N1mpG-IQIUDm@google.com>
On Wed, 2026-08-19 at 16:03 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > To me this is not a valid reason. Sashiko is great, but we can't let false
> > positives drive the patches. Given that the series is so big now, I'd think
> > it would be better to leave 6 and 9 for follow up, so we can focus on the
> > core thing.
>
> Hmm, I disagree. If the consolidation weren't here, I'd absolutely ask for
> it. This is new feature enabling. Yeah, it happens to be tagged for stable,
> but at the end of the day, it's new feature enabling. And it's standard
> operation procedure to do cleanups and dedup code as part of new feature
> enabling.
>
> If anything patch 6 should be patch 1, but that's a minor detail I can sort
> out when applying (assuming another version isn't required).
Ok. But you disagree with dropping the patch? Or that avoiding sashiko reports
of existing issues is an invalid reason to change the series?
I think it's good to discuss a bit how to handle sashiko scenarios.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-19 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-19 9:48 [PATCH v4 0/9] KVM: TDX: Enable VM-DoS Prevention Features for TDX Xiaoyao Li
2026-08-19 9:48 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] KVM: TDX: Enable Notify VM exit Xiaoyao Li
2026-08-20 8:48 ` Binbin Wu
2026-08-19 9:48 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] KVM: TDX: Check if there is valid exit infos based on vp_enter_ret Xiaoyao Li
2026-08-19 16:39 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-08-20 1:53 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-08-20 9:11 ` Binbin Wu
2026-08-19 9:48 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] KVM: TDX: Set bits 31:16 to 0 for the synthesized Exit Reason Xiaoyao Li
2026-08-20 9:16 ` Binbin Wu
2026-08-19 9:48 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] KVM: TDX: Don't assume exit_reason[31:16] is all-0 in tdx_to_vmx_exit_reason() Xiaoyao Li
2026-08-19 10:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 9:48 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] KVM: TDX: Update exit_reason on wait_for_sept_zap return Xiaoyao Li
2026-08-19 19:08 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-08-19 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] KVM: VMX: Preserve negative return value in vmx_handle_exit() with bus lock detected Xiaoyao Li
2026-08-19 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] KVM: VMX: Make handle_bus_lock_vmexit() a shared helper Xiaoyao Li
2026-08-19 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] KVM: TDX: Enable Bus Lock VM exit Xiaoyao Li
2026-08-19 9:49 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] KVM: VMX: Consolidate the exit handler for VMX and TDX Xiaoyao Li
2026-08-19 22:57 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] KVM: TDX: Enable VM-DoS Prevention Features for TDX Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-08-19 23:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-08-19 23:08 ` Edgecombe, Rick P [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8f715ebf5cb0ef70803ca8c6ad462d9de7dfa8be.camel@intel.com \
--to=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.