From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Lars_Tobias_B=F8rsting?= Subject: Re: Reiser4 kernel modules Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 14:07:45 +0100 Message-ID: <8jflldlhg4e.fsf@panter.stud.ntnu.no> References: <8jfy8hpgzk4.fsf@panter.stud.ntnu.no> <1099299984.1712.82.camel@tribesman.namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <1099299984.1712.82.camel@tribesman.namesys.com> (Vladimir Saveliev's message of "Mon, 01 Nov 2004 12:06:24 +0300") List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Reiser4 Vladimir Saveliev writes: > On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 22:16, Lars Tobias B=F8rsting wrote: >> Is there no such thing as a CVS-repository or a tarball release for >> the reiser4 source? >>=20 >> If there is such a thing as a tarball release or CVS-repository, is it >> then possible to compile it as kernel modules [...] If it is not >> possible to compile it as kernel modules, why is this? > > reiser4 needs some changes in kernel code. And why does reiser4 need changes in the kernel code? Is it really a smart approach to require kernel changes for reiser4 to work? Why isn't it possible to build reiser4 as kernel modules? --=20 Lars Tobias B=F8rsting