From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
To: torvalds@transmeta.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch?] truncate and timestamps
Date: 23 May 2003 20:02:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8mRUVSAXw-B@khms.westfalen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305221726300.19226-100000@home.transmeta.com>
torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) wrote on 22.05.03 in <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305221726300.19226-100000@home.transmeta.com>:
> On Fri, 23 May 2003 Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
> >
> > On the other hand, my question was really a different one:
> > do we want to follow POSIX, also in the silly requirement
> > that truncate only sets mtime when the size changes, while
> > O_TRUNC and ftruncate always set mtime.
>
> Does POSIX really say that? What a crock.
That's why POSIX says no such thing.
What it *does* say is
Upon successful completion, if fildes refers to a regular file, the
ftruncate() function shall mark for update the st_ctime and st_mtime
fields of the file and the S_ISUID and S_ISGID bits of the file mode may
be cleared. If the ftruncate() function is unsuccessful, the file is
unaffected.
See:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/ftruncate.html
Is it really so hard to look it up that we need to spout FUD instead?
MfG Kai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-23 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-23 0:17 [patch?] truncate and timestamps Andries.Brouwer
2003-05-23 0:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-05-23 1:17 ` viro
2003-05-23 2:42 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-23 5:11 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-23 5:25 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-05-23 3:14 ` David Schwartz
2003-05-26 23:42 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-27 1:17 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-23 18:02 ` Kai Henningsen [this message]
2003-05-23 19:07 ` Andries Brouwer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-22 19:09 Andries.Brouwer
2003-05-22 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8mRUVSAXw-B@khms.westfalen.de \
--to=kaih@khms.westfalen.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.