From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: davidb@codeaurora.org (David Brown) Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 11:00:05 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: runtime patching of __virt_to_phys() and __phys_to_virt() In-Reply-To: (Nicolas Pitre's message of "Tue, 04 Jan 2011 13:33:05 -0500 (EST)") References: <1294129208-15201-1-git-send-email-nico@fluxnic.net> <1294129208-15201-2-git-send-email-nico@fluxnic.net> <20110104084517.GA9791@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110104165347.GA24935@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110104180620.GC24935@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <8yahbdoh6fs.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> Message-ID: <8ya39p8h4ui.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 04 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, David Brown wrote: > >> Any idea how much it would hurt other targets to have the >> __virt_to_phys() and __phys_to_virt() have a 16-bit fixup, even if only >> the upper 8 bits are used? > > Probably not that much. But let's make it work satisfactorily for the > general case first, and then we might consider and test variations that > could accommodate msm. Sounds like a good plan. We've got quite a few other things to clean up before we can build for more than one arch anyway. David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.