From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] msm: Add CPU queries Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:52:24 -0800 Message-ID: <8ya7hdsb1hz.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> References: <1292384961-8851-1-git-send-email-stepanm@codeaurora.org> <1295468747-22796-1-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org> <1295468747-22796-2-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org> <1295914163.29639.77.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <8yak4htj0lb.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> <1295915034.29639.78.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <8yay669hka5.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> <1295976910.25496.1.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <8ya39ogg5dm.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> <1295983549.25496.33.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <8yaei80epie.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> <1295985978.25496.35.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <00e801cbbd11$96b3ca90$c41b5fb0$@gmu.edu> <8yafwsgchlz.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> <65e852891f18ed0cd764fba918bb842b.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:9052 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751686Ab1AZGw0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2011 01:52:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <65e852891f18ed0cd764fba918bb842b.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> (Stepan Moskovchenko's message of "Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:32:44 -0800 (PST)") Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Stepan Moskovchenko Cc: Zhaohui Wang , 'Daniel Walker' , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 25 2011, Stepan Moskovchenko wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 25 2011, Zhaohui Wang wrote: >> >>> Maybe it's not appropriate to cut in your discussion. >> >> It's quite appropriate. >> >>> Can anyone explain what's the difference between qsd8X50 and msm8x60? >>> No msm8x50, right? >> >> Well, they're just part numbers, and the numbering isn't all that >> consistent over time: >> http://www.qualcomm.com/products_services/chipsets/snapdragon.html >> >> The first snapdragon device was calls a QSD (8250 and 8660). They are > > David, I think you mean "8250 and 8650" here. QSD8250 and QSD8650 are > identical as far as Linux is concerned, whereas MSM8660 is different, > having two cores, etc. Yes, thanks. David From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: davidb@codeaurora.org (David Brown) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:52:24 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v2 01/11] msm: Add CPU queries In-Reply-To: <65e852891f18ed0cd764fba918bb842b.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> (Stepan Moskovchenko's message of "Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:32:44 -0800 (PST)") References: <1292384961-8851-1-git-send-email-stepanm@codeaurora.org> <1295468747-22796-1-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org> <1295468747-22796-2-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org> <1295914163.29639.77.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <8yak4htj0lb.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> <1295915034.29639.78.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <8yay669hka5.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> <1295976910.25496.1.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <8ya39ogg5dm.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> <1295983549.25496.33.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <8yaei80epie.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> <1295985978.25496.35.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <00e801cbbd11$96b3ca90$c41b5fb0$@gmu.edu> <8yafwsgchlz.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> <65e852891f18ed0cd764fba918bb842b.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <8ya7hdsb1hz.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 25 2011, Stepan Moskovchenko wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 25 2011, Zhaohui Wang wrote: >> >>> Maybe it's not appropriate to cut in your discussion. >> >> It's quite appropriate. >> >>> Can anyone explain what's the difference between qsd8X50 and msm8x60? >>> No msm8x50, right? >> >> Well, they're just part numbers, and the numbering isn't all that >> consistent over time: >> http://www.qualcomm.com/products_services/chipsets/snapdragon.html >> >> The first snapdragon device was calls a QSD (8250 and 8660). They are > > David, I think you mean "8250 and 8650" here. QSD8250 and QSD8650 are > identical as far as Linux is concerned, whereas MSM8660 is different, > having two cores, etc. Yes, thanks. David