From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: Add __weak attributed functions for pwm operations Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 09:25:28 -0700 Message-ID: <8yad3jmk1on.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> References: <1305290602-29859-1-git-send-email-mpallaka@codeaurora.org> <1305290602-29859-2-git-send-email-mpallaka@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:25368 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752851Ab1EMQZ3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2011 12:25:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1305290602-29859-2-git-send-email-mpallaka@codeaurora.org> (Mohan Pallaka's message of "Fri, 13 May 2011 18:13:21 +0530") Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Mohan Pallaka Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.intradead.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, rmk@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk On Fri, May 13 2011, Mohan Pallaka wrote: > For chip drivers that support both pwm and non-pwm modes > would encounter compilation errors if the platform doesn't > have support for pwm though the chip is programmed to work > in non-pwm mode. Add __weak attributed pwm functions to avoid > compilation issues in these scenarios. > > Change-Id: Ia507bf659d4d67d71f135012e7d919aca6c45c6c Make sure you remove these 'Change-Id' lines before sending patches. They aren't supposed to be in the kernel since they refer to an internal server, and aren't useful to anyone else. David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.