From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/32] video/msm_fb: use system_wq instead of dedicated workqueues
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:21:31 -0800
Message-ID: <8yaoc74d0xw.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com>
References: <1294062595-30097-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
	<1294062595-30097-21-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:23514 "EHLO
	wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753027Ab1AYXVc (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:21:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1294062595-30097-21-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (Tejun Heo's
	message of "Mon, 3 Jan 2011 14:49:43 +0100")
Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Jan 03 2011, Tejun Heo wrote:

> With cmwq, there's no reason to use separate workqueues.  Drop
> msmfb_info->resume_workqueue and use system_wq instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>
> Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> Only compile tested.  Please feel free to take it into the subsystem
> tree or simply ack - I'll route it through the wq tree.

I'll pull this into the MSM tree.

Thanks,
David

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.