All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Schwarz,Andre <andre.schwarz@matrix-vision.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] mpc83xx: add config options to spd_sdram
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 20:42:19 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <908840060.379.1302115339879.JavaMail.open-xchange@proteus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302107849.4586.14.camel@oslab-l1>

York,
?
ok - will give it a try tomorrow.
?
Cheers,
Andr?
?

York Sun <yorksun@freescale.com> hat am 6. April 2011 um 18:37 geschrieben:

> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 10:18 +0200, Andre Schwarz wrote:
> > Kim, York,
> >
> > >> I have made some mods to spd_sdram.c for various reason:
> > >>
> > >> 1.
> > >> use SPD setup also for soldered RAM.
> > >> This allows DDR mounting options without U-Boot change because SPD data
> > >> is written during in-circuit/boundary-scan testing.
> > > not sure I understand this - board with soldered RAM can't physically
> > > get the SPD data from RAM, yet SPD data were somehow acquired and
> > > written into some ROM, so spd_sdram() is still needed to parse&
> > > program the controller without requiring a new u-boot binary?
> > SPD data is nothing more than an I2C-EEPROM soldered on each memory module
> > containing the physical details of the memory devices.
> > Since I already have an I2C-EEPROM on the board I can use it for SPD
> > data, i.e.
> > the board's memory is configured using normal detection routines.
> >
> > During production (exactly: board testing) the EEPROM will be programmed
> > with an SPD
> > table matching the soldered memory devices. This gives some flexibility
> > regarding size and
> > speed grades ... some devices have pretty short life-cycles.
>
> That's right. If you have the SPD in I2C-EEPROM, you have a real SPD as
> far as software concerns. Just provide the I2C address.
>
> > >> 3.
> > >> for optimized signal integrity and power consumption we need more
> > >> influence on
> > >> the on-die termination. Although the assumed default values are working
> > >> they
> > >> are far from ideal.
> > > board specific things like this are perfectly acceptable, of course.
> > ok.
> > > however, it should not be being done by glittering old-83xx/spd_sdram
> > > with an extra #ifdef for every new parameter
> >
> > ok - what about this :
> >
> > #if !defined(CONFIG_SYS_DDR_MODE_ODT_VALUE)
> > #define CONFIG_SYS_DDR_MODE_ODT_VALUE 0x40
> > #endif
> >
> > mode_odt_enable = CONFIG_SYS_DDR_MODE_ODT_VALUE;
> >
> >
> > I really can't think of this change being a problem for anybody.
> >
>
> I would suggest to put it in fsl_ddr_board_options() in ddr.c under the
> board directory. There you can override any options, including
>
> popts->cs_local_opts[i].odt_rd_cfg
> popts->cs_local_opts[i].odt_wr_cfg
> popts->cpo_override
>
>
>
> York
>
>
>--
Gru?,
Andr? Schwarz

MATRIX VISION GmbH, Talstrasse 16, DE-71570 Oppenweiler
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 271090
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Gerhard Thullner, Werner Armingeon, Uwe Furtner

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-06 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-05  9:49 [U-Boot] [RFC] mpc83xx: add config options to spd_sdram Andre Schwarz
2011-04-05 21:52 ` Kim Phillips
2011-04-05 22:03   ` York Sun
2011-04-06  8:42     ` Andre Schwarz
2011-04-06 16:30       ` York Sun
2011-04-06  8:18   ` Andre Schwarz
2011-04-06 16:37     ` York Sun
2011-04-06 18:42       ` Schwarz, Andre [this message]
2011-04-07 20:42         ` Schwarz, Andre
2011-04-07 20:56           ` York Sun
2011-04-08  7:41             ` Andre Schwarz
2011-04-08 15:31               ` York Sun
2011-04-08 16:29                 ` Andre Schwarz
2011-04-08 16:36                   ` York Sun
2011-04-08 16:43                     ` Andre Schwarz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=908840060.379.1302115339879.JavaMail.open-xchange@proteus \
    --to=andre.schwarz@matrix-vision.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.