Re: [OE-core] nanbield: grpc_1.56.2 fails nativesdk build

[Vyacheslav Yurkov <uvv.mail@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2167 bytes --]

On 13.02.2024 16:19, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Tested and works too, but I see this patch was reverted:
>
>
> Revert "protobuf: stage protoc binary to sysroot"
>
>      This reverts commit a0557fe5433620717eeb00d3b16801711337b1a4.
>
>      As said by Ross[Ø]:
>      "Putting the _target_ protoc into the sysroot for executation at _build_
>      time isn't useful because even if it has the right architecture, the
>      tune might be incompatible.  Recipes which want protoc should just depend
>      on protobuf-native."
>
>      This has been reverted recently by Samuli[1]:
>      "If protoc is enabled for the build, recipes using protobuf will
>      fail when protoc is not available in the recipe sysroot"
>
>      Be the revert is incorret as This is an issue coming from qtgrpc
>      other recipes that use protobuf or gRPC compiler, proplery looks for
>      the binary in the correct sysroot folder.
>
>      Qtgrpc recipe should fix this issue at the recipe level, for example this
>      is what I've done for "etcd-cpp-apiv3" recipe[2] that doesn't need this
>      patch to properly compile.
>
>      So keeping this hack doesn't seems to be a correct fix.
>
>      Note that qtgrpc recipe isn't available on meta-oe nor any other public
>      layers.
>
>      0:https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/oe/patch/20230904161230.377450-1-ross.burton@arm.com/
>      1:https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/oe/patch/20230927051101.3088498-1-samuli.piippo@qt.io/
>      2:https://github.com/etcd-cpp-apiv3/etcd-cpp-apiv3/commit/47f0d9e0326f3cc31c801a0ecf7312d1049ece3e
>
>      CC: Samuli Piippo<samuli.piippo@gmail.com>
>      CC: Ross Burton<ross.burton@arm.com>
>      Signed-off-by: Clément Péron<peron.clem@gmail.com>
>      Signed-off-by: Khem Raj<raj.khem@gmail.com>
>      (cherry picked from commit bfb626a23022d871ce3c0c64cb9e5d1cc17c737e)
>      Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster<akuster808@gmail.com>
>
> So then what is the correct fix for grpc ?
>
>   Joakim
>

Reverted and then applied again :)

If you are interested, see the full discussion here 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/topic/101679410#105284

Slava

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3464 bytes --]