From: Hariharan Mari <hari55@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Ulrich Weigand <ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com>,
Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] kvm: s390: Reject KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING on ucontrol VMs
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 16:08:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <90f03f727a19907415536cc0323bdcb1@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241216092140.329196-4-schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
On 2024-12-16 10:21, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
> Prevent null pointer dereference when processing
> KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_S390_ADAPTER routing entries.
> The ioctl cannot be processed for ucontrol VMs.
>
> Fixes: f65470661f36 ("KVM: s390/interrupt: do not pin adapter interrupt
> pages")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Schlameuss <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Hariharan Mari <hari55@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 3 +++
> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index 454c2aaa155e..f15b61317aad 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -1914,6 +1914,9 @@ No flags are specified so far, the corresponding
> field must be set to zero.
> #define KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_HV_SINT 4
> #define KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_XEN_EVTCHN 5
>
> +On s390, adding a KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_S390_ADAPTER is rejected on ucontrol
> VMs with
> +error -EINVAL.
> +
> flags:
>
> - KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID: used along with KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI routing
> entry
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> index 22d73c13e555..d4f031e086fc 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> @@ -2898,6 +2898,8 @@ int kvm_set_routing_entry(struct kvm *kvm,
> switch (ue->type) {
> /* we store the userspace addresses instead of the guest addresses */
> case KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_S390_ADAPTER:
> + if (kvm_is_ucontrol(kvm))
> + return -EINVAL;
> e->set = set_adapter_int;
> uaddr = gmap_translate(kvm->arch.gmap, ue->u.adapter.summary_addr);
> if (uaddr == -EFAULT)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-18 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-16 9:21 [PATCH v2 0/6] selftests: kvm: s390: Reject invalid ioctls on ucontrol VMs Christoph Schlameuss
2024-12-16 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] kvm: s390: Reject setting flic pfault attributes " Christoph Schlameuss
2024-12-19 10:03 ` Hariharan Mari
2024-12-16 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] selftests: kvm: s390: Add ucontrol flic attr selftests Christoph Schlameuss
2024-12-18 15:07 ` Hariharan Mari
2024-12-19 15:52 ` Hariharan Mari
2024-12-16 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] kvm: s390: Reject KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING on ucontrol VMs Christoph Schlameuss
2024-12-18 15:08 ` Hariharan Mari [this message]
2024-12-19 15:53 ` Hariharan Mari
2024-12-16 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] selftests: kvm: s390: Add ucontrol gis routing test Christoph Schlameuss
2024-12-18 15:08 ` Hariharan Mari
2024-12-19 15:54 ` Hariharan Mari
2024-12-16 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] selftests: kvm: s390: Streamline uc_skey test to issue iske after sske Christoph Schlameuss
2024-12-18 15:09 ` Hariharan Mari
2024-12-16 9:21 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] selftests: kvm: s390: Add has device attr check to uc_attr_mem_limit selftest Christoph Schlameuss
2024-12-18 15:09 ` Hariharan Mari
2024-12-16 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] selftests: kvm: s390: Reject invalid ioctls on ucontrol VMs Claudio Imbrenda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=90f03f727a19907415536cc0323bdcb1@linux.ibm.com \
--to=hari55@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.