From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 131C8D530; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:45:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QHVngFVK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 790C9C433C9; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:45:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1698421554; bh=M5cZ4Uk5UHS51pZo0cfXXopOOU+Ewc0rgIoSeP5TaS8=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QHVngFVKX3lB8qTUk2Fw3efNy3Ben7Jox1xQdQm0b/MiWSsT0Mhh4dkmNEyN6Bagu RyjvJcJPVOe7BK+btaweQRm38BLBRJJcfYFZnbICGwXl+2gPbE3qKAjlRZlLbU7KoB HOO1p3MfWqKmkx81fLsbHkDqu8OJQoViVlD2Iu0q/azbRwKqpxGvLf1SiT+V/mfyrm 2bbLrc08ejaoP1KmEWmMQp8v3n+bHBs/pEvq1z8yCoAGSB0I/IJ6qBEfHAxZtDrvFF E4hiTj7cuXVwhMpbVvH0GOzQFRviTWPqfm3juuw/gM83AffbhjYfY/NHOGk0uykELi W4SNIk1eDNN3A== Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:45:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Mat Martineau To: Jakub Kicinski cc: Matthieu Baerts , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Geliang Tang , Kishen Maloor , netdev@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 03/10] mptcp: userspace pm send RM_ADDR for ID 0 In-Reply-To: <20231027084324.42e434bb@kernel.org> Message-ID: <9138af81-6312-9a96-076e-6b164285c34b@kernel.org> References: <20231025-send-net-next-20231025-v1-0-db8f25f798eb@kernel.org> <20231025-send-net-next-20231025-v1-3-db8f25f798eb@kernel.org> <20231026202629.07ecc7a7@kernel.org> <20231027084324.42e434bb@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Fri, 27 Oct 2023, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:34:27 -0700 (PDT) Mat Martineau wrote: >>> This series includes three initial patches that we had queued in our >>> mptcp-net branch, but given the likely timing of net/net-next syncs this >>> week, the need to avoid introducing branch conflicts, and another batch >>> of net-next patches pending in the mptcp tree, the most practical route >>> is to send everything for net-next. >> >> So, that's the reasoning, but I'll send v2 without the cc's. > > No need, I can strip when applying. > Thanks Jakub, appreciate this! - Mat