From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Preferred subj= with multiple LSMs
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:37:38 -0400
Message-ID: <9150011.WShEb2oc6S@x2>
References: <f824828c-5c9d-b91e-5cec-70ee7a45e760@schaufler-ca.com>
	<3577098.oGDFHdoSSQ@x2>
	<201113d1-192f-d6b3-17bb-bcf219bc5f15@magitekltd.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <201113d1-192f-d6b3-17bb-bcf219bc5f15@magitekltd.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-audit@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit>,
	<mailto:linux-audit-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com

On Tuesday, July 16, 2019 12:33:30 PM EDT Lenny Bruzenak wrote:
> On 7/16/19 11:14 AM, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > Quoting has a specific meaning in audit fields. So, we really shouldn't
> > do
> > that. We can simply pick another field delimiter. I really don't care
> > which it is as long as its illegal for use in a label. For example, we
> > use
> > 
> > #define AUDIT_KEY_SEPARATOR 0x01
> > 
> > to separate key fields. We can pick almost anything. (exclamation mark,
> > semi- colon, hash, plus symbol, tilde, 0x02, whatever) But it will need
> > to be documented and put into the API so that everyone is aware of the
> > convention.
> > 
> > -Steve
> 
> Also should it not be the "#define AUDIT_INTERP_SEPARATOR 0x1D" for
> enriched format records?

True. That one is disqualified, too.

-Steve