From: "Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@linuxbox.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: David Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>,
Dave Chiluk <chiluk@canonical.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bfields@fieldses.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFSv4: Use exponential backoff delay for Ni
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:28:21 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <916743278.65.1366903701195.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366899034.6812.4.camel@leira.trondhjem.org>
Hi,
Just to clarify, the IBM delay behavior is not legal?
Matt
----- "Trond Myklebust" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> wrote:
>
> OK, then. Now all I need is actual motivation for changing the
> existing
> code other than handwaving arguments about "polling is better than
> flat
> waits".
> What actual use cases are impacting us now, other than the AIX design
> decision to force CLOSE to retry at least once before succeeding?
>
--
Matt Benjamin
The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
http://linuxbox.com
tel. 734-761-4689
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-25 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-24 20:55 [PATCH] NFSv4: Use exponential backoff delay for NFS4_ERRDELAY Dave Chiluk
2013-04-24 21:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-04-24 21:28 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-24 21:54 ` Dave Chiluk
2013-04-24 22:35 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-25 12:19 ` David Wysochanski
2013-04-25 13:19 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-25 13:29 ` bfields
2013-04-25 13:30 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-25 13:49 ` bfields
2013-04-25 14:10 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-25 15:28 ` Matt W. Benjamin [this message]
2013-04-25 15:42 ` [PATCH] NFSv4: Use exponential backoff delay for Ni Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-25 15:42 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-25 18:19 ` [PATCH] NFSv4: Use exponential backoff delay for NFS4_ERRDELAY bfields
2013-04-25 18:40 ` Chuck Lever
2013-04-25 18:46 ` bfields
2013-04-25 18:51 ` Chuck Lever
2013-04-25 18:57 ` bfields
2013-04-25 18:52 ` Myklebust, Trond
2013-04-25 14:51 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=916743278.65.1366903701195.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com \
--to=matt@linuxbox.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chiluk@canonical.com \
--cc=dwysocha@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.