From: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>,
song@kernel.org
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/3] md/raid10: convert resync_lock to use seqlock
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 08:49:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <917c01c1-1e2b-66f9-69f1-ed706b7ffc8f@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04128618-962f-fd4e-64a9-09ecf7f83776@deltatee.com>
On 9/2/22 2:41 AM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-08-29 07:15, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
>>
>> Currently, wait_barrier() will hold 'resync_lock' to read 'conf->barrier',
>> and io can't be dispatched until 'barrier' is dropped.
>>
>> Since holding the 'barrier' is not common, convert 'resync_lock' to use
>> seqlock so that holding lock can be avoided in fast path.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> I've found some lockdep issues starting with this patch in md-next while
> running mdadm tests (specifically 00raid10 when run about 10 times in a
> row).
>
> I've seen a couple different lock dep errors. The first seems to be
> reproducible on this patch, then it possibly changes to the second on
> subsequent patches. Not sure exactly.
That's why I said "try mdadm test suites too to avoid regression." ...
Guoqing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-02 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-29 13:14 [PATCH -next 0/3] md/raid10: reduce lock contention for io Yu Kuai
2022-08-29 13:15 ` [PATCH -next 1/3] md/raid10: fix improper BUG_ON() in raise_barrier() Yu Kuai
2022-08-29 19:53 ` John Stoffel
2022-08-30 1:01 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-30 6:32 ` Paul Menzel
2022-08-29 13:15 ` [PATCH -next 2/3] md/raid10: convert resync_lock to use seqlock Yu Kuai
2022-09-01 18:41 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-09-02 0:49 ` Guoqing Jiang [this message]
2022-09-02 0:56 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-09-02 1:00 ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-09-02 1:21 ` Yu Kuai
2022-09-02 8:14 ` Yu Kuai
2022-09-02 17:03 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-09-03 6:07 ` Yu Kuai
2022-09-02 9:42 ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-09-02 10:02 ` Yu Kuai
2022-09-02 10:16 ` Guoqing Jiang
2022-09-02 10:53 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-29 13:15 ` [PATCH -next 3/3] md/raid10: prevent unnecessary calls to wake_up() in fast path Yu Kuai
2022-08-29 13:40 ` [PATCH -next 0/3] md/raid10: reduce lock contention for io Guoqing Jiang
2022-08-31 11:55 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-29 13:58 ` Paul Menzel
2022-08-30 1:09 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-31 11:59 ` Paul Menzel
2022-08-31 12:07 ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-31 18:00 ` Song Liu
2022-09-03 6:08 ` Yu Kuai
2022-09-09 14:45 ` Song Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=917c01c1-1e2b-66f9-69f1-ed706b7ffc8f@linux.dev \
--to=guoqing.jiang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.