All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	"Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@google.com>
Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com" <tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com>,
	"Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com"
	<kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	"binbin.wu@linux.intel.com" <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
	"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
	"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>, "Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@intel.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: TDX: Do not clear poisoned pages
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 15:38:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <91df7051-2405-4609-9e86-2bbc02829644@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c315604761ad760fc29bebdb007fac239a1b45f9.camel@intel.com>

On 6/25/25 15:32, Huang, Kai wrote:
>> 2. page may have had an integrity violation or a hardware error
>> (we can't tell which), and PageHWPoison(page) is true
> Right.  I think the point of avoiding MOVDIR64B to such page is we cannot
> tell whether it is a hardware error or not.  If it is a hardware error,
> touching it using MOVDIR64B may cause additional #MC which will panic kernel
> since now the #MC happens in the kernel context.

First and foremost, does the code path in question in this case touch
userspace pages? Or pages that are only "kernel context" in the first place.

Second, if we can't tell the difference between integrity violation or a
hardware error and this code needs to clear "integrity violation" poison
then won't this change just fundamentally break the erratum workaround
in the first place?!?!

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-25 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-18 12:08 [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for recovery for machine check in TDX/SEAM non-root mode Adrian Hunter
2025-06-18 12:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/mce: Fix missing address mask in recovery for errors " Adrian Hunter
2025-06-18 12:36   ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-18 14:55   ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-19 11:57     ` Adrian Hunter
2025-06-27 15:23       ` Adrian Hunter
2025-06-27 15:25         ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-27 16:24           ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-27 16:33             ` Dave Hansen
2025-07-30 10:54               ` Adrian Hunter
2025-07-30 11:57                 ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-30 14:20                 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-06-27 16:28         ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-18 23:20   ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-18 23:39     ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-18 23:46       ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-18 23:57         ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-18 23:53       ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-18 12:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: TDX: Do not clear poisoned pages Adrian Hunter
2025-06-18 12:39   ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-06-18 14:58   ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-25 14:33     ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-06-25 16:25       ` Adrian Hunter
2025-06-25 16:31         ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-25 16:42           ` Adrian Hunter
2025-06-25 16:57             ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-25 16:42         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-06-25 22:32         ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-25 22:38           ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2025-06-26  1:19             ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-26 15:31               ` Luck, Tony
2025-06-26 22:20                 ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-26 22:33                   ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-27  0:56                     ` Huang, Kai
2025-06-18 23:09   ` Huang, Kai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=91df7051-2405-4609-9e86-2bbc02829644@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.lindgren@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.