From: miquels@traveler.cistron-office.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linus's include file strategy redux
Date: 15 Dec 2000 21:02:16 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91e0so$9bn$1@enterprise.cistron.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001215152137.K599@almesberger.net> <NBBBJGOOMDFADJDGDCPHAENMCJAA.law@sgi.com>
In article <NBBBJGOOMDFADJDGDCPHAENMCJAA.law@sgi.com>,
LA Walsh <law@sgi.com> wrote:
>It was at that
>point, the externally compiled module "barfed", because like many modules,
>it expected, like many externally compiled modules, that it could simply
>access all of it's needed files through /usr/include/linux which it gets
>by putting /usr/include in it's path. I've seen commercial modules like
>vmware's kernel modules use a similar system where they expect
>/usr/include/linux to contain or point to headers for the currently running
>kernel.
vmware asks you nicely
where are the running kernels include files [/usr/src/linux/include" >
And then compiles the modules with -I/path/to/include/files
In fact, the 2.2.18 kernel already puts a 'build' symlink in
/lib/modules/`uname -r` that points to the kernel source,
which should be sufficient to solve this problem.. almost.
It doesn't tell you the specific flags used to compile the kernel,
such as -m486 -DCPU=686
> So at that point it becomes what we should name it under
>/usr/include/linux. Should it be:
>1) "/usr/include/linux/sys" (my preference)
/usr should be static. It could be a read-only NFS mount.
Putting system dependant configuration info here (which a
/usr/include/linux/sys symlink *is*) is wrong.
I think /lib/modules/`uname -r`/ should contain a script that
reproduces the CFLAGS used to compile the kernel. That way,
you not only get the correct -I/path/to/kernel/include but
the other compile-time flags (like -m486 etc) as well.
# sh /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kconfig --cflags
-D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.2.18pre24/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fno-strength-reduce -m486 -malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2 -DCPU=686
Standard module Makefile that will _always_ work:
#! /usr/bin/make -f
CC = $(shell /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kconfig --cc)
CFLAGS = $(shell /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kconfig --cflags)
module.o:
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c module.c
Flags could be:
--check Consistency check - are the header files there and
does include/linux/version.h match
--cc Outputs the CC variable used to compile the kernel
(important now that we have gcc, kgcc, gcc272)
--arch Outputs the ARCH variable
--cflags Outputs the CFLAGS
--include-path Outputs just the path to the include files
Generating and installing this 'kconfig' script as part of
"make modules_install" is trivial, and would solve all problems.
Well as far as I can see, ofcourse, I might have missed something..
Mike.
--
RAND USR 16514
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-15 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <91gr99$bs81o$1@fido.engr.sgi.com>
2000-12-14 23:55 ` Linus's include file strategy redux LA Walsh
2000-12-15 0:14 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2000-12-15 0:17 ` Alexander Viro
2000-12-15 0:39 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2000-12-15 0:33 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-15 0:48 ` Alexander Viro
2000-12-15 0:56 ` David Riley
2000-12-15 1:05 ` Alexander Viro
2000-12-15 4:24 ` ferret
2000-12-16 11:30 ` Marcus Sundberg
2000-12-15 14:57 ` Kurt Roeckx
2000-12-15 15:23 ` Dana Lacoste
2000-12-15 22:28 ` Alex Buell
2000-12-16 22:41 ` Peter Samuelson
2000-12-18 15:51 ` Dana Lacoste
2000-12-18 17:08 ` Peter Samuelson
2000-12-18 19:32 ` David Schleef
2000-12-18 17:04 ` richard offer
2000-12-19 5:16 ` Peter Samuelson
2000-12-15 0:15 ` Alexander Viro
2000-12-15 7:21 ` LA Walsh
2000-12-15 11:05 ` Chmouel Boudjnah
2000-12-15 14:21 ` Werner Almesberger
2000-12-15 17:15 ` ferret
2000-12-15 17:46 ` Werner Almesberger
2000-12-15 20:29 ` Joe deBlaquiere
2000-12-15 21:27 ` Werner Almesberger
2000-12-15 22:58 ` Joe deBlaquiere
2000-12-15 23:56 ` Werner Almesberger
2000-12-16 22:50 ` Peter Samuelson
2000-12-17 0:04 ` Joe deBlaquiere
2000-12-17 2:05 ` Peter Samuelson
2000-12-15 18:10 ` LA Walsh
2000-12-15 21:02 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg [this message]
2000-12-16 4:04 ` ferret
2000-12-16 11:09 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2000-12-16 17:20 ` ferret
2000-12-17 0:21 ` J . A . Magallon
2000-12-16 23:10 ` Peter Samuelson
2000-12-17 1:15 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2000-12-17 2:18 ` Peter Samuelson
2000-12-15 21:21 ` Werner Almesberger
2000-12-15 21:36 ` LA Walsh
2000-12-15 22:48 ` J . A . Magallon
2000-12-15 23:47 ` Werner Almesberger
2000-12-16 4:11 ` ferret
2000-12-16 2:50 ` richard offer
2000-12-16 4:22 ` What about 'kernel package'? was: " ferret
2000-12-15 19:35 ` Matt D. Robinson
2000-12-15 21:36 ` Werner Almesberger
2000-12-18 17:48 Petr Vandrovec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='91e0so$9bn$1@enterprise.cistron.net' \
--to=miquels@traveler.cistron-office.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.