From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Move PCI PASID enablement to probe path
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 21:09:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <92b55591-e106-4366-ba5b-0588af50770f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6650ce02-ac85-4cb6-941c-cc7e8b6effc4@amd.com>
On 2024/8/16 20:16, Vasant Hegde wrote:
> On 8/16/2024 4:19 PM, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> Currently, PCI PASID is enabled alongside PCI ATS when an iommu domain is
>> attached to the device and disabled when the device transitions to block
>> translation mode. This approach is inappropriate as PCI PASID is a device
>> feature independent of the type of the attached domain.
> Reading through other thread, I thought we want to enable both PASID and PRI in
> device probe path. Did I miss something?
PRI is different. PRI should be enabled when the first iopf-capable
domain is attached to device or its PASID, and disabled when the last
such domain is detached.
Thanks,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-16 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-16 10:49 [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Move PCI PASID enablement to probe path Lu Baolu
2024-08-16 12:16 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-08-16 13:09 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2024-08-16 13:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-19 6:34 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-08-19 7:09 ` Baolu Lu
2024-08-19 7:11 ` Baolu Lu
2024-08-19 12:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-20 4:10 ` Baolu Lu
2024-08-20 8:30 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-08-20 8:55 ` Yi Liu
2024-08-20 13:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-20 13:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-26 9:11 ` Vasant Hegde
2024-08-19 7:32 ` Yi Liu
2024-08-19 3:14 ` Yi Liu
2024-08-19 3:34 ` Baolu Lu
2024-08-19 4:51 ` Yi Liu
2024-08-19 5:15 ` Baolu Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=92b55591-e106-4366-ba5b-0588af50770f@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.