From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mani kanth Subject: Re: netfilter Digest, Vol 9, Issue 50 Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:13:22 +0530 Message-ID: <92bf04d20504260243113d4ea7@mail.gmail.com> References: <42690580.7572f072.78eb.58cdSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.gmail.com> Reply-To: Mani kanth Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <42690580.7572f072.78eb.58cdSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org please provide me with more information thank you k.mani kanth > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:59:14 +0200 > From: Mariusz Kruk > Subject: Re: route all internet traffic through dummy device? > To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org > Message-ID: <20050422075914.GA27193@epsilon.rdc.pl> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Diso-8859-2 >=20 > On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 09:48:59AM +0200, Andreas Mimz wrote: > > I'm trying to route all internet traffic through a dummy network device= . > > Unfortunately, I wasn't able to do that yet :-( >=20 > I used a tunnel between dwo different addresses on loopback device (ie. > 127.0.0.2 and 127.0.0.3) and policy routing which puts everything from > outside to one end of the tunnel and from the inside into another end > (in my setup it works bi-directionaly - another hop is added for packets > traveling both ways). > If anyone is interested in more detailed description, I will gladly > provide info.