From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shyam Sundar S K Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-pci-core: Tuning mode support for HS200 on AMD Platforms Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 11:48:44 +0530 Message-ID: <9320898d-502d-9d62-1a07-e3fdbe0d4dc4@amd.com> References: <2ef1e2da-5913-85fe-65a7-0984ac04164d@amd.com> <418f99e4-18e5-38a6-0b4d-0815f3bd604f@intel.com> <8510d441-230a-9d93-222b-ba870869f094@amd.com> <09915eb8-f4c0-fbf3-723d-66441f0e4b7d@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-by2nam03on0084.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.42.84]:46206 "EHLO NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751036AbcKIGdb (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 01:33:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <09915eb8-f4c0-fbf3-723d-66441f0e4b7d@intel.com> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Adrian Hunter Cc: Ulf Hansson , linux-mmc , "Sen, Pankaj" , "Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra" , "Agrawal, Nitesh-kumar" Hi Ulf, Adrian, Thank you for the feedback. Apologies, I misunderstood it. Submitting two separate patches one from Adrian and the other from me re-spinned to the latest rc tree. Thanks, Shyam On 11/8/2016 3:15 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 07/11/16 14:00, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 27 October 2016 at 11:52, Shyam Sundar S K wrote: >>> Made changes to the earlier submission based on the comments >>> received from Adrian. >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Sen, Pankaj >>> Reviewed-by: Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra >>> Signed-off-by: S-k, Shyam-sundar >>> >>> Also, adding patch from Adrian for handling the device specific >>> private data. >>> >>> From: Adrian Hunter >>> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:04:45 +0300 >>> Subject: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-pci: Let devices define their own private data >> >> Shyam, >> >> Seems like this should be two separate changes, one made by Adrian and >> one by you. Can you please re-spin. > > Yes, 2 separate patches please. I didn't mean mix the patches together - > sorry if there was confusion. >