From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keith Owens Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 05:50:52 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics Message-Id: <9353.1133934652@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> List-Id: In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:52:33 -0800." References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , Nick Piggin , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:52:33 -0800 (PST), Christoph Lameter wrote: >+DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t [MAX_NUMNODES][NR_STAT_ITEMS], vm_stat_diff); How big is that array going to get? The total per cpu data area is limited to 64K on IA64 and we already use at least 34K. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932656AbVLGFvZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:51:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932651AbVLGFvZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:51:25 -0500 Received: from omx3-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.20]:10125 "EHLO omx3.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932644AbVLGFvZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:51:25 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3_20040314 03/14/2004 with nmh-1.1 From: Keith Owens To: Christoph Lameter cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , Nick Piggin , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:52:33 -0800." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 16:50:52 +1100 Message-ID: <9353.1133934652@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:52:33 -0800 (PST), Christoph Lameter wrote: >+DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t [MAX_NUMNODES][NR_STAT_ITEMS], vm_stat_diff); How big is that array going to get? The total per cpu data area is limited to 64K on IA64 and we already use at least 34K. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keith Owens Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] Framework for accurate node based statistics In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:52:33 -0800." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 16:50:52 +1100 Message-ID: <9353.1133934652@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , Nick Piggin , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti List-ID: On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:52:33 -0800 (PST), Christoph Lameter wrote: >+DEFINE_PER_CPU(local_t [MAX_NUMNODES][NR_STAT_ITEMS], vm_stat_diff); How big is that array going to get? The total per cpu data area is limited to 64K on IA64 and we already use at least 34K. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org