From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Brookes Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen 2.0.7 on VIA C3 (EPIA) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 08:16:54 -0500 Message-ID: <9380aad7050906061662bc3f13@mail.gmail.com> References: <9380aad705090311057a87f455@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: cbrookes@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, xen-users@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > No. But I compiled Kernel 2.6.12.4 yesterday with 'CONFIG_M386=3Dy', got > some warnings from the compiler related to '486 and higher instruction > set', and will try this kernel today on my EPIAs ME6000. Let us know how you get on. I have a ME6000 board in another system, so if you have any success I'll have to swap them out. I think it has the exact same CPU (aside from speed) though :-/ > IMHO you should get warnings or errors, if you compile for VIAC3_2 (386, > 486, 586 should also work), which lets you find the locations. The freeze is occurring in the actual xen kernel, rather than in the domain 0 linux/netbsd kernel that gets loaded. > > Unfortunately my C & ASM skills being what they are (i.e not great) >=20 > Same here;-) The original patch for Xen 2.0.0 wasn't particularly complicated so I'm hopeful that this won't be a big problem. Well, you have to be optimistic eh? =3D