From: Denis Benato <denis.benato@linux.dev>
To: Armandas Kvietkus <armundunelis@gmail.com>, luke@ljones.dev
Cc: hansg@kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fxzxaxon@outlook.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: asus-armoury: downgrade missing power limits warning to debug
Date: Sun, 3 May 2026 23:23:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93850129-bb0d-45e7-9708-2a84cd8037ea@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260503175734.27795-1-armundunelis@gmail.com>
On 5/3/26 19:57, Armandas Kvietkus wrote:
> When a system is not found in the power_limits DMI table,
> init_rog_tunables() emits a pr_warn() and returns. This is
> expected behaviour for hardware that does not support ROG
> power limit tunables, not an error condition.
>
> Downgrade to pr_debug() to avoid spurious boot noise on
> unsupported systems while preserving the message for debugging.
>
> Reported-by: fxzxaxon@outlook.com
> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221441
> Signed-off-by: Armandas Kvietkus <armundunelis@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/asus-armoury.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-armoury.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-armoury.c
> index 5b0987ccc..c8e9ff89f 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-armoury.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-armoury.c
> @@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ static void init_rog_tunables(void)
> /* Match the system against the power_limits table */
> dmi_id = dmi_first_match(power_limits);
> if (!dmi_id) {
> - pr_warn("No matching power limits found for this system\n");
> + pr_debug("No matching power limits found for this system\n");
I don't agree with this: most distro suppress debug and this warning is very handy to understand what's wrong when people report "missing sliders".
> return;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-03 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-03 17:57 [PATCH] platform/x86: asus-armoury: downgrade missing power limits warning to debug Armandas Kvietkus
2026-05-03 21:23 ` Denis Benato [this message]
2026-05-03 22:14 ` Denis Benato
2026-05-06 11:26 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-05-06 21:44 ` Denis Benato
2026-05-07 13:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93850129-bb0d-45e7-9708-2a84cd8037ea@linux.dev \
--to=denis.benato@linux.dev \
--cc=armundunelis@gmail.com \
--cc=fxzxaxon@outlook.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luke@ljones.dev \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.