From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/9] eal: move librte_malloc to eal/common
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 11:02:28 +0200
Message-ID: <9388529.0Xl0Ea6jym@xps13>
References: <1433586732-28217-1-git-send-email-sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
 <2707498.ThPVHMap7h@xps13> <559644F5.8050506@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com
 [209.85.212.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966AC902
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  3 Jul 2015 11:03:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wibdq8 with SMTP id dq8so94540405wib.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 02:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <559644F5.8050506@intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2015-07-03 09:16, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio:
> On 02/07/2015 13:14, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2015-06-26 16:29, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy:
> >> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ F: lib/librte_eal/common/*
> >>   F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/*
> >>   F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/generic/
> >>   F: doc/guides/prog_guide/env_abstraction_layer.rst
> >> +F: doc/guides/prog_guide/malloc_lib.rst
> >>   F: app/test/test_alarm.c
> >>   F: app/test/test_atomic.c
> >>   F: app/test/test_byteorder.c
> >> @@ -97,6 +98,8 @@ F: app/test/test_spinlock.c
> >>   F: app/test/test_string_fns.c
> >>   F: app/test/test_tailq.c
> >>   F: app/test/test_version.c
> >> +F: app/test/test_malloc.c
> >> +F: app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c
> > I think we should keep a separate maintainer section for memory allocator
> > in EAL. I suggest this:
> >
> > Memory allocation
> > M: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
> > F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_mem*
> > F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_malloc.h
> > F: lib/librte_eal/common/*malloc*
> > F: lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_mem*
> > F: lib/librte_eal/common/eal_hugepages.h
> > F: doc/guides/prog_guide/malloc_lib.rst
> > F: app/test/test_malloc.c
> > F: app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c
> >
> >
> Fine with me.
> Do you need a new version of the patches with that change?

Yes please.
Thanks for your involvement.