From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] drm_bus cleanups and other cruft removal Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:10:21 +0200 Message-ID: <9409411.VSkvj7k3Qp@avalon> References: <1397252175-14227-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [95.142.166.194]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222786E45D for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:10:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1397252175-14227-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Daniel Vetter List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Hi Daniel, On Friday 11 April 2014 23:35:57 Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi all, > > I've chatted a bit with Thierry about how we could allow drivers to not even > required a drm_bus any more. Which is relevant when e.g. due to the new > master/component no platform device is conveniently around. > > So I've brushed off my old series to remove some drm_bus functions and other > cruft and rebased it onto latest drm-next. > > It gets rid of everything but drm_bus->set_busid, but Thierry has a good > plan to make that one optional too - it's only really needed for backwards > compat with some old libdrm versions on pci drm drivers. > > Comments and review highly welcome. > > Presuming no one screams I plan to send a pull request with these patches to > Dave fairly early for 3.16 so that Thierry can base his tegra rework on top > of it. Apart from a few comments on patch 10/16, there's nothing I could complain about. Great work, as usual :-) Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart