All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] 9p/client: don't assume signal_pending() clears on recalc_sigpending()
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 09:04:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9422b998-5bab-85cc-5416-3bb5cf6dd853@kernel.dk> (raw)

signal_pending() really means that an exit to userspace is required to
clear the condition, as it could be either an actual signal, or it could
be TWA_SIGNAL based task_work that needs processing. The 9p client
does a recalc_sigpending() to take care of the former, but that still
leaves TWA_SIGNAL task_work. The result is that if we do have TWA_SIGNAL
task_work pending, then we'll sit in a tight loop spinning as
signal_pending() remains true even after recalc_sigpending().

Move the signal_pending() logic into a helper that deals with both, and
return -ERESTARTSYS if the reason for signal_pendding() being true is
that we have task_work to process.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y9TgUupO5C39V%2FDW@xpf.sh.intel.com/
Reported-and-tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

---

v2: don't rely on task_work_run(), rather just punt with -ERESTARTYS at
    that point. For one, we don't want to export task_work_run(), it's
    in-kernel only. And secondly, we need to ensure we have a sane state
    before running task_work. The latter did look fine before, but this
    should be saner. Tested this also fixes the report as well for me.

diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c
index 622ec6a586ee..9caa66cbd5b7 100644
--- a/net/9p/client.c
+++ b/net/9p/client.c
@@ -652,6 +652,25 @@ static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_prepare_req(struct p9_client *c,
 	return ERR_PTR(err);
 }
 
+static int p9_sigpending(int *sigpending)
+{
+	*sigpending = 0;
+
+	if (!signal_pending(current))
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * If we have a TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL pending, abort to get it
+	 * processed.
+	 */
+	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL))
+		return -ERESTARTSYS;
+
+	*sigpending = 1;
+	clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * p9_client_rpc - issue a request and wait for a response
  * @c: client session
@@ -687,12 +706,9 @@ p9_client_rpc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type, const char *fmt, ...)
 	req->tc.zc = false;
 	req->rc.zc = false;
 
-	if (signal_pending(current)) {
-		sigpending = 1;
-		clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING);
-	} else {
-		sigpending = 0;
-	}
+	err = p9_sigpending(&sigpending);
+	if (err)
+		goto reterr;
 
 	err = c->trans_mod->request(c, req);
 	if (err < 0) {
@@ -789,12 +805,9 @@ static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_zc_rpc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type,
 	req->tc.zc = true;
 	req->rc.zc = true;
 
-	if (signal_pending(current)) {
-		sigpending = 1;
-		clear_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING);
-	} else {
-		sigpending = 0;
-	}
+	err = p9_sigpending(&sigpending);
+	if (err)
+		goto reterr;
 
 	err = c->trans_mod->zc_request(c, req, uidata, uodata,
 				       inlen, olen, in_hdrlen);

-- 
Jens Axboe


             reply	other threads:[~2023-02-03 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-03 16:04 Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-02-05 10:02 ` [PATCH v2] 9p/client: don't assume signal_pending() clears on recalc_sigpending() Dominique Martinet
2023-02-06 20:19   ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-06 21:42     ` Dominique Martinet
2023-02-06 21:56       ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-06 21:58         ` Jens Axboe
2023-02-06 22:29         ` Dominique Martinet
2023-02-06 22:56           ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9422b998-5bab-85cc-5416-3bb5cf6dd853@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pengfei.xu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.