From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B251DA2E5 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 17:29:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728322180; cv=none; b=upzNaLK8eHyXzqTqSb7PckBUAmc5FB4NVYZr7S0xH7V7coxHe63aUB8FeoLLauWQRSMnvMea8Su73KgaYp2W+mYjSRQz+fAznZ+Qr3XbhVKa7O4Mmr8jVy5Rlb68Z1ImxiouRIH0gktkEoCYAi2e+q/K/CykDEiqZVrIvxsZ+LM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728322180; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RF9z7GvdJ4lJotYmyZUHgySTAhJZ08X9FTkedvGm1vQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=nQRuBHwSMldANPOFeuf48mJuQdTsUdjGhyOJCDkts5IirLimN6aN744cg65pIY6a3xfE3BeuQDEhT4Sn2mQfYcbmrMeqEwlim0N1seXj3ExVnA3Bs48OrcdUC3/u5n5WyoJw8HbZedPcKbXt7Dg8rhMUldb+Qz9NhjwPgYorKmk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070B8DA7; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 10:30:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.196.28] (eglon.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.28]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08D1A3F73F; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 10:29:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9479c799-86fc-4d9e-addb-66011ecae9c7@arm.com> Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:29:32 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/40] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to /fs/resctrl Content-Language: en-GB To: Reinette Chatre , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Fenghua Yu , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , H Peter Anvin , Babu Moger , shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, D Scott Phillips OS , carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles , Xin Hao , peternewman@google.com, dfustini@baylibre.com, amitsinght@marvell.com, David Hildenbrand , Rex Nie , Dave Martin References: <20241004180347.19985-1-james.morse@arm.com> From: James Morse In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Reinette, On 04/10/2024 22:18, Reinette Chatre wrote: > While you wait for folks to consider these changes, could you please take a look > at [1] from an Arm/MPAM perspective? My understanding is that Arm/MPAM also > requires assigning counters to do monitoring and [1] aims to create > a generic interface to do so. Is [1] something that Arm/MPAM can build on > or are there some changes that can be made before its inclusion to help > with future MPAM support? Yup, this is on my list to get back into this week. I did rebase the MPAM tree over Babu's v6, but haven't had the chance to test it [0]. This is my previous feedback on where the arch/fs split needed to be came form. Thanks, James [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git/log/?h=mpam/abmc/v6