All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: shmobile: r8a7779: Wait for status on selected MSTP clocks
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 08:26:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9488859.oh59qfV17n@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384357973-27365-3-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>

Hi Morimoto-san,

On Wednesday 20 November 2013 18:07:24 Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> Hi Laurent
> 
> > From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> > 
> > When enabling some of the module clocks by clearing stop bits in the
> > MSTP control registers, the CPG requires waiting for the status
> > registers to signal that the clocks have started. Failure to do so will
> > result in returning from the clk_enable() call with the clock
> > potentially still disabled, leading to various race conditions and
> > difficult to debug errors.
> > 
> > Enable status wait for all the r8a7779 MSTP clocks that report their
> > status.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7779.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7779.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7779.c index b7ce0e7..1955738 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7779.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7779.c
> > @@ -52,12 +52,6 @@
> > 
> >  #define MSTPCR1		IOMEM(0xffc80034)
> >  #define MSTPCR3		IOMEM(0xffc8003c)
> >  #define MSTPSR1		IOMEM(0xffc80044)
> > 
> > -#define MSTPSR4		IOMEM(0xffc80048)
> > -#define MSTPSR6		IOMEM(0xffc8004c)
> > -#define MSTPCR4		IOMEM(0xffc80050)
> > -#define MSTPCR5		IOMEM(0xffc80054)
> > -#define MSTPCR6		IOMEM(0xffc80058)
> > -#define MSTPCR7		IOMEM(0xffc80040)
> 
> Why do you remove these MSTPCRx in this patch ?
> It is out-of this purpose

I've removed them as they're unused. This could be split to a separate patch 
if preferred, I've just thought it would be overkill.

> >  #define MODEMR		0xffcc0020
> > 
> > @@ -127,16 +121,16 @@ static struct clk mstp_clks[MSTP_NR] = {
> > 
> >  	[MSTP322] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR3, 22, 0), /* SDHI1 */
> >  	[MSTP321] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR3, 21, 0), /* SDHI2 */
> >  	[MSTP320] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR3, 20, 0), /* SDHI3 */
> > 
> > -	[MSTP120] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1, 20, 0), /* VIN3 */
> > -	[MSTP116] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1, 16, 0), /* PCIe */
> > -	[MSTP115] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1, 15, 0), /* SATA */
> > -	[MSTP114] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1, 14, 0), /* Ether */
> > -	[MSTP110] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1, 10, 0), /* VIN0 */
> > -	[MSTP109] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1,  9, 0), /* VIN1 */
> > -	[MSTP108] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1,  8, 0), /* VIN2 */
> > -	[MSTP103] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1,  3, 0), /* DU */
> > -	[MSTP101] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1,  1, 0), /* USB2 */
> > -	[MSTP100] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1,  0, 0), /* USB0/1 */
> > +	[MSTP120] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1, 20, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > VIN3 */
> > +	[MSTP116] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1, 16, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > PCIe */
> > +	[MSTP115] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1, 15, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > SATA */
> > +	[MSTP114] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1, 14, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > Ether */
> > +	[MSTP110] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1, 10, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > VIN0 */
> > +	[MSTP109] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1,  9, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > VIN1 */
> > +	[MSTP108] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1,  8, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > VIN2 */
> > +	[MSTP103] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1,  3, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > DU */
> > +	[MSTP101] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1,  1, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > USB2 */
> > +	[MSTP100] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1,  0, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > USB0/1 */> 
> >  	[MSTP030] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR0, 30, 0), /* I2C0 */
> >  	[MSTP029] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR0, 29, 0), /* I2C1 */
> >  	[MSTP028] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR0, 28, 0), /* I2C2 */

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-21  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-13 15:52 [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: shmobile: r8a7779: Wait for status on selected MSTP clocks Laurent Pinchart
2013-11-21  2:07 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-11-21  8:26 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2013-11-25  0:05 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-11-25  0:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-11-25  0:23 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-11-25  3:36 ` Simon Horman
2013-11-25 14:19 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-11-26  0:26 ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9488859.oh59qfV17n@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.