From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>,
Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: alua: Revert "Move a scsi_device_put() call out of alua_check_vpd()"
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:16:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94DE4EA7-422A-4535-8D16-7EB038D147DB@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f822744-e137-4aa4-396b-a82348d5d84a@acm.org>
> On 19-Nov-2022, at 12:24 AM, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote:
>
> On 11/18/22 08:03, Sachin Sant wrote:
>>> On 18-Nov-2022, at 8:37 PM, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote:
>>> Can you also test patch 2/2 from this series (https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221117183626.2656196-3-bvanassche@acm.org/)?
>> I tested with both the patches applied on top of next-20221117.
>
> Thank you Sachin for having confirmed this. In the future when testing an
> entire patch series, consider replying with "Tested-by:" to the cover letter
> instead of the first patch. I think that is the conventional way to indicate
> that a patch series has been tested in its entirety instead of a single
> patch from a series.
>
I did not receive the cover letter so replied to the first patch.
I should have explicitly called out that I have tested both the patches.
Sorry about the confusion.
- Sachin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-19 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-17 18:36 [PATCH 0/2] Rework how the ALUA driver calls scsi_device_put() Bart Van Assche
2022-11-17 18:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: alua: Revert "Move a scsi_device_put() call out of alua_check_vpd()" Bart Van Assche
2022-11-18 6:11 ` Sachin Sant
2022-11-18 15:07 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-11-18 16:03 ` Sachin Sant
2022-11-18 18:54 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-11-19 9:46 ` Sachin Sant [this message]
2022-11-17 18:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: alua: Call scsi_device_put() from non-atomic context Bart Van Assche
2022-11-26 0:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] Rework how the ALUA driver calls scsi_device_put() Martin K. Petersen
2022-12-01 3:45 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94DE4EA7-422A-4535-8D16-7EB038D147DB@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sachinp@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mwilck@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.