All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>
To: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
Cc: Rishabh Jain <rishabh.jain1198@gmail.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: pci-quirks: always assert xHCI OS ownership
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 15:52:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95146b5a-80d2-4e91-855d-6577f2f31f0e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260819001511.45b3621b.michal.pecio@gmail.com>

On 8/18/26 17:15, Michal Pecio wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:00:47 -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> On 8/16/26 15:03, Michal Pecio wrote:
>>> Not sure if this has anything to do with PROM21, or if some BIOS
>>> is just trying to use the xHC at resume because it's permitted to.
>>> Then it makes too many changes for Restore State to still work.
>>>
>>> Potentially, such bugs may have happened and been left unsolved or
>>> "solved" with RESET_ON_RESUME quirks and other hacks.
>>
>> What do you think about making this a series with each of those
>> quirks dropped one-by-one?  The head patch (a variation of this one)
>> could go to stable and the rest of the commits dropping those can go
>> to linux-next.
> 
> Hard to tell. All we have is a wild theory. I couldn't even test what
> happens when the BIOS claims an unclaimed xHC during resume from S3,
> because my BIOS doesn't do that even when I clear the "OS owned" bit
> before suspending.
> 
> Those quirks may be wrong in the sense that they weren't specific to
> the particular PCI IDs, but to some particular buggy BIOSes or kernels
> in the past. Maybe those problems don't exist, maybe they still do.
> 
> I have completely disabled RESET_ON_RESUME on my test system with no
> apparent ill efects so far.
> 
> OTOH, I tried disabling the "broken streams (UAS)" quirk on ASM1042.
> While the kernel crash which those chips used to cause has been fixed
> long ago, it turns out they just don't work correctly (Set TR Deq is
> a No-Op with streams). So I'm not rushing to remove this quirk.
> 
> Regards,
> Michal

So maybe we try with dropping RESET_ON_RESUME quirks only in this go around.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-21 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-15  1:45 [PATCH] usb: pci-quirks: always assert xHCI OS ownership Rishabh Jain
2026-08-16 16:33 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-08-16 18:15   ` [PATCH v2] " Rishabh Jain
2026-08-16 20:03   ` [PATCH] " Michal Pecio
2026-08-16 21:00     ` Mario Limonciello
2026-08-18 22:15       ` Michal Pecio
2026-08-21 20:52         ` Mario Limonciello [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95146b5a-80d2-4e91-855d-6577f2f31f0e@kernel.org \
    --to=superm1@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
    --cc=rishabh.jain1198@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.