From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Phillip Hellewell <phillip@hellewell.homeip.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, mike@halcrow.us, mhalcrow@us.ibm.com,
mcthomps@us.ibm.com, toml@us.ibm.com, yoder1@us.ibm.com,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/13: eCryptfs] Superblock operations
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 15:52:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9519.1146840757@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1146839690.10108.21.camel@kleikamp.austin.ibm.com>
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Either way, it will use more stack; the mere fact that whilst it's using the
> > value, the compiler may stash it in a register is irrelevant.
>
> Is the stack usage very close to exceeding 4 KB? Could saving one more
> pointer on the stack cause a problem?
I suspect you don't know since it's a stacked filesystem.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-05 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-04 3:17 [PATCH 0/12: eCryptfs] eCryptfs version 0.1.6 Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-04 3:27 ` [PATCH 1/13: eCryptfs] fs/Makefile and fs/Kconfig Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-04 3:35 ` [PATCH 2/13: eCryptfs] Documentation Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-04 7:32 ` Pavel Machek
2006-05-04 12:11 ` Michael Halcrow
2006-05-04 3:36 ` [PATCH 3/13: eCryptfs] Makefile Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-04 3:37 ` [PATCH 4/13: eCryptfs] Main module functions Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-04 3:37 ` [PATCH 5/13: eCryptfs] Header declarations Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-04 14:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-05-04 14:58 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2006-05-04 15:22 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-05-04 15:29 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2006-05-04 15:08 ` Michael Thompson
2006-05-04 3:38 ` [PATCH 6/13: eCryptfs] Superblock operations Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-04 9:55 ` Pavel Machek
2006-05-04 14:02 ` Michael Thompson
2006-05-04 14:26 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-05-04 14:37 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-05-04 15:00 ` Michael Thompson
2006-05-04 15:12 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-05-04 21:40 ` David Howells
2006-05-05 13:12 ` Dave Kleikamp
2006-05-05 14:03 ` David Howells
2006-05-05 14:34 ` Dave Kleikamp
2006-05-05 14:52 ` David Howells [this message]
2006-05-05 16:15 ` Timothy R. Chavez
2006-05-04 3:39 ` [PATCH 7/13: eCryptfs] Dentry operations Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-05 16:46 ` Timothy R. Chavez
2006-05-04 3:39 ` [PATCH 8/13: eCryptfs] File operations Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-04 4:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-05-05 18:55 ` Timothy R. Chavez
2006-05-04 3:40 ` [PATCH 9/13: eCryptfs] Inode operations Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-04 3:41 ` [PATCH 10/13: eCryptfs] Mmap operations Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-04 15:13 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-05-04 21:43 ` David Howells
2006-05-05 15:22 ` Dave Kleikamp
2006-05-05 15:38 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-05-06 2:21 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-06 16:00 ` Michael Halcrow
2006-05-06 16:42 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-06 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-04 3:42 ` [PATCH 11/13: eCryptfs] Keystore Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-04 3:42 ` [PATCH 12/13: eCryptfs] Crypto functions Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-04 3:43 ` [PATCH 13/13: eCryptfs] Debug functions Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-04 20:30 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-05-04 7:28 ` [PATCH 0/12: eCryptfs] eCryptfs version 0.1.6 Pavel Machek
2006-05-04 12:08 ` Michael Halcrow
2006-05-05 9:05 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-05-05 16:08 ` Michael Halcrow
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-13 3:37 [PATCH 0/13: eCryptfs] eCryptfs Patch Set Phillip Hellewell
2006-05-13 3:44 ` [PATCH 6/13: eCryptfs] Superblock operations Phillip Hellewell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9519.1146840757@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ezk@cs.sunysb.edu \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcthomps@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mhalcrow@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mike@halcrow.us \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=phillip@hellewell.homeip.net \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=shaggy@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=toml@us.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yoder1@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.